Compliance Updates
DGA: Three orders and two reprimands to Skill on Net Ltd for breach of the Anti-Money Laundering Act
On April 3rd, 2024, the Danish Gambling Authority has issued three orders to Skill on Net Ltd (Skill on Net) for breaching the rules of the Anti-Money Laundering Act on risk assessment, procedures for internal control and documentation of implemented controls.
On April 3rd, 2024, the Danish Gambling Authority has also given Skill on Net two reprimands for breaching the rules on business procedures and the rules on whistleblower scheme in the Anti-Money Laundering Act.
The orders and reprimands are issued in connection with the Danish Gambling Authority’s inspection of Skill on Net’s material, which Skill on Net has prepared in order to comply with the Anti-Money Laundering Act.
Order for inadequate risk assessment
Order (a) has been issued because Skill on Net’s risk assessment is insufficient, as no separate risk assessment has been made of the individual identified risks associated with Skill on Net’s business model, including products and payment solutions, as well as the risk factors associated with these. Section 7(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering Act states that undertakings subject to the Act must identify and assess the risk that the undertaking may be misused for money laundering or terrorist financing. It is the Danish Gambling Authority’s assessment that the risk assessment must include a separate assessment of the risk of the individual products and payment solutions, as well as a separate risk assessment of the risk factors associated with these. Thus, Skill on Net has not complied with the risk assessment obligation in section 7(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering Act.
Order for inadequate business processes
Order (b) has been issued because Skill on Nets’ written procedures do not describe how, when and by whom the internal controls are monitored to ensure that the internal controls are implemented. Section 8(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering Act states that undertakings subject to the Act must have adequate written procedures, which must include internal controls. The requirement for internal control also means that checks must be carried out to ensure that the controls are implemented. Thus, Skill on Net has not sufficiently complied with the obligation to have procedures for internal control.
Order for lack of documentation for controls
Order (c) has been issued because Skill on Net has not documented that internal controls have been implemented. Section 8(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering Act states that undertakings subject to the Act must document the checks carried out. Thereby, Skill on Net has not complied with the obligation under section 8(1) of the AML Act.
Reprimand for inadequate business processes
Reprimand (a) is given because Skill on Net’s business procedure for establishing customer relationships until October 16, 2023 was deficient, as there was a discrepancy between the business procedure and practice. Section 8(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering Act states that undertakings subject to the Act must have adequate written procedures and that the procedures must describe how the areas are handled in practice. Thus, Skill on Net has not complied with the obligation to have sufficient written procedures for establishing customer relationships.
Reprimand (a) has been issued because Skill on Net’s business procedures up to 16 October 2023 did not take into account that customer due diligence procedures must be carried out at appropriate times, as required by section 10(1)(1)(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering Act. Thus, Skill on Net has not complied with the obligation to have sufficient written procedures for the implementation of customer due diligence procedures at appropriate times.
Reprimand (a) is also given because Skill on Net’s business procedure for politically exposed persons until 16 October 2023 was deficient, as PEP screening of customers who had not paid over a fixed defined amount was not performed on an ongoing basis. Section 18(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering Act states that undertakings subject to the Act must have procedures in place to determine whether the customer is a politically exposed person, close associate or close business partner of a politically exposed person. Reviewing whether an established customer has changed status to politically exposed person must include all customers. Thus, Skill on Net has not complied with the obligation to have sufficient written procedures for PEP screening.
Reprimand for inadequate whistleblower scheme
Reprimand (b) is given because Skill on Net’s whistleblower scheme until June 2023 did not sufficiently meet the requirement for anonymity, as reporting could only be done by e-mail. Section 35(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering Act states that undertakings subject to the Anti-Money Laundering Act must have a system where their employees can report violations or potential violations of anti-money laundering legislation via a special, independent and autonomous channel. It also states that reports must be able to be made anonymously. Thus, Skill on Net has not complied with the requirement of anonymity for whistleblowers.
The Danish Gambling Authority assesses that an inadequate risk assessment as well as inadequate business procedures and whistleblower scheme may have increased Skill on Net’s risk of being misused for money laundering. The purpose of the risk assessment is for the gambling operator to have a useful tool that provides an overview and understanding of where and to what extent the gambling operator is exposed to being misused for money laundering or terrorist financing and what measures are necessary to mitigate the risks. Business procedures must be a description of the activities that the gambling operator must perform to ensure compliance with legislation and other regulations and that the gambling operator’s policies and guidelines are followed. Adequate risk assessment, business procedures and a whistleblower scheme are fundamental to the Anti-Money Laundering Act, and the seriousness of the violation has therefore led to three orders and two reprimands.
Duty to act
The orders entail an obligation for Skill on Net to act. This means that Skill on Net must, within two months, submit a revised risk assessment, business procedures for the control of internal controls, and within six months submit documentation that internal controls have been implemented.
The reprimands do not entail any obligation for Skill on Net to act, as the violations no longer exist, as Skill on Net has subsequently revised its business procedures and whistleblower scheme.
The post DGA: Three orders and two reprimands to Skill on Net Ltd for breach of the Anti-Money Laundering Act appeared first on European Gaming Industry News.
Compliance Updates
How Curacao new AML requirements differ from other flexible license jurisdictions
By: Dmitry Hotsyn, Senior Consultant and Head of CIS Desk at 4H Agency
Discussing Anti-Money Laundering (AML) rules in a way that keeps everyone awake is a real challenge. The iGaming industry often overlooks anything filled with jargon like KYC, AML, CDD, and SoWs—terms that just breed myths and misconceptions about jurisdictions supposedly having lax AML standards and low compliance burdens. For a while, Curacao was viewed as one of these almost mythical places.
Not anymore.
A significant shake-up has occurred with Curacao’s latest overhaul of its AML regulations, set to take effect on September 1, 2024. This update has triggered quite a bit of debate among gambling operators who view these new rules as unwelcoming, especially since Curacao is known for its sluggish pace in updating its gambling regulations.
But may it really be as bad as Curaçao’s deadline management?
Curacao’s AML Regulatory Changes: An Overview
Curacao is continuously revamping its regulatory frameworks, taking a page from Malta’s book — Maltifying the industry may work best to describe this process. The new AML rules, while perceived as burdensome, are in fact a balanced update alligning the Curacao practices with generally acceptable standards. Key aspects of the new regulations include:
- Clear Customer Due Diligence (CDD) thresholds: Operators must conduct CDD at the earliest practical time, but no later than when a player engages in a transaction amounting to approximately EUR 2200;
- Sanction and Politically Exposed Persons (PEP) Screening: Mandatory for at least EU, US and UN sanctions lists;
- High-Risk Indicators: A detailed list of indicators for high-risk cases has been provided, noting that the use of cryptocurrencies increases risk, though it is not outright prohibited;
- AML Officer Role: Each operator shall have a dedicated AML officer, equipped with sufficient resources and headcount to manage risks effectively;
- Policies and Guides: Ah year, more internal docs, rules and practice guides are expected from the operators holding licences in Curacao.
Despite the extensive nature of Curacao’s new rules, in essence, they closely resemble those enforced in Malta and other EU countries, as well as competing jurisdictions offering flexible licenses. The upcoming webinar hosted by 4H Agency and Hipther Agency will delve into these comparisons, focusing on jurisdictions like Anjouan, Kanawake, and Tobique, alongside Curacao.
Key Insights on AML Across Jurisdictions
- Detailed AML Frameworks: Curacao and Tobique lead with the most comprehensive AML regulations. Kanawake’s requirements are also robust albeit not as detailes as Curacao rules;
- CDD Thresholds: Similar financial thresholds exist across these jurisdictions (approximately EUR 2000), with varied stipulations on the timing of CDD post-player registration (again, Curacao is not the leader here);
- Outsourcing AML Functions: All jurisdictions permit outsourcing some AML activities to third-party providers, providing flexibility in compliance strategies;
- Stringency of Regulations: Tobique’s regulations are notably stringent, casually requiring additional checks like adverse media searches to identify higher risk profiles;
- Anjouan the Outlier: Anjouan stands out for its outdated AML framework, lacking specific provisions for the gambling sector. For now, this could attract operators seeking more AML-friendly environments. However, Anjouan will inevitably follow the Curacao’s reformatory steps if the country intends to make iGaming an important factor of the now-struggling economy.
The evolution of AML regulations in Curacao represents a predictable shift towards more robust regulatory environment, aligning more closely with global standards. While initially perceived as onerous, these changes are in line not only with international practices, but with the rules already in force in a competing jurisdaction.
Our upcoming webinar will further explore these developments, providing attendees with comprehensive insights into flexible licensing options in 2024.
The post How Curacao new AML requirements differ from other flexible license jurisdictions appeared first on European Gaming Industry News.
JOI Gaming, the operator of gambling brand Jacks in the Netherlands, has been warned it could face a maximum penalty of €1m if it repeats a violation of breaches of the ban on role models in gambling marketing.
The Dutch gambling regulator, Kansspelautoriteit (KSA), said that at the Jack’s Racing Day event in 2023, role models for the operator signed caps with the event logo and the Jacks brand name.
Meanwhile, role models posing with hostesses wearing corporate clothing with the Jacks logo were pictured and posted on the Jack’s Racing Day website and on social media.
“These posts were still available when the order was imposed. If JOI Gaming does not remove these statements immediately, the company must pay a penalty of €50,000 per day,” the KSA said.
If the violation is repeated in the run-up to or during future editions of Jack’s Racing Day, JOI Gaming must pay a penalty of €200,000 per day with a maximum penalty of €1m, the regulator said.
Jack’s Racing Day 2024 is set to be held on August 2-4 at TT Circuit Assen. “To protect vulnerable groups such as young people and risk and problem gamblers, strict rules apply to the use of role models for gambling advertising,” the KSA said in a statement.
“Role models include celebrities, (former) professional footballers, influencers and models. The use of role models is prohibited for high-risk gambling, such as casinos and online gambling.
“For lower-risk gambling, such as lotteries, they may be used under strict conditions.”
The post Dutch Regulator Warns JOI Gaming Over Use of Celebrities appeared first on European Gaming Industry News.
In a new agreement between the Consumer Ombudsman, the Gambling Authority and the Gambling Board, the authorities and the board will coordinate their efforts when they have to take action against gambling companies’ illegal marketing of games in Denmark.
Gambling companies’ marketing can cross jurisdictions. Therefore, the Consumer Ombudsman, the Gambling Authority and the Spilreklamenævnet have just entered into a cooperation agreement with a view to avoiding duplication of effort and strengthening the overall coordinated effort when it comes to the regulation of gambling companies’ marketing in Denmark.
The Gambling Advertising Board will forward cases to the Consumer Ombudsman or the Gambling Authority if gaming companies do not comply with the board’s criticism, or if the board finds violations of the authorities’ rules by a company.
Conversely, the Consumer Ombudsman and the Gambling Authority will inform complainants of the possibility to complain to the Gambling Advertising Board if a company breaks the industry’s code of conduct, but not the rules handled by either the Consumer Ombudsman or the Gambling Authority.
The Consumer Ombudsman and the Gambling Authority oversee various areas in relation to the marketing of games. The Consumer Ombudsman is responsible for the supervision of gambling companies’ compliance with the Marketing Act, as well as other consumer protection rules, while the Gambling Authority supervises compliance with the rules on the marketing of games in section 36, subsection of the Gambling Act. 1, as well as the rules on sales promotion measures in relevant gaming announcements.
The Gaming Advertising Board, which is a board set up by players in the gaming industry, handles complaints about gaming companies’ marketing that is in breach of the industry’s code of conduct. The purpose of the code is to strengthen the social responsibility of the industry’s marketing towards vulnerable groups and children, as well as to limit gambling addiction.
It has been agreed that the Consumer Ombudsman, the Gambling Authority and the Gambling Advertising Board will regularly inform each other of relevant cases, as well as hold annual meetings.
Consumer Ombudsman Torben Jensen said: “Our new cooperation agreement with the Gambling Authority and the Gambling Advertising Board strengthens our supervision of gambling companies’ marketing. The agreement involves better internal communication, ensures coordination and prevents duplication of work, which benefits consumers.”
The post Danish Authorities Form Agreement to Tackle Illegal Gambling Marketing appeared first on European Gaming Industry News.
-
Uncategorized3 days ago
Musburger Media Purchases VSiN, The Sports Betting Network
-
Uncategorized2 days ago
GGPoker & Triton Poker Offer High-Roller And Super-High-Roller Events At 2024 WSOP Paradise
-
Uncategorized3 days ago
Betmotion unveils ‘Jogos do Betmotion’ competition to celebrate 2024 Olympics
-
Uncategorized3 days ago
GGPoker & Triton Poker Offer High-Roller And Super-High-Roller Events At 2024 WSOP Paradise
-
Uncategorized2 days ago
Arizona Department of Gaming Releases May Sports Betting Figures
-
Uncategorized1 day ago
QTech Games recruits David Camacho to take the lead for LatAm markets
-
Uncategorized1 day ago
QTech Games recruits David Camacho to take the lead for LatAm markets
-
Uncategorized1 day ago
QTech Games recruits David Camacho to take the lead for LatAm markets