Latest News
New Study Reveals Economic and Social Risks of iGaming
In response to the increasing concerns over the social and economic risks of iGaming, the gaming and entertainment business leaders have joined forces to launch the National Association Against iGaming (NAAiG).
The organization is formed in opposition to the expansion of iGaming and its well-reported economic and social dangers and urges other local businesses, employee unions, and community groups to mobilize in their effort to protect local communities.
A new study for NAAiG by The Innovation Group, a research and advisory firm specializing in gaming, hospitality, and tourism that has previously conducted multiple studies of online gambling for state governments and industry stakeholders, debunks the myth that iGaming offers easy revenue for states. Instead, the study uncovers the damaging effects of iGaming expansion, exposing widespread job losses and significant declines in economic output across multiple states.
Main findings of the report:
Land-based casino revenue drops by 16% on average after iGaming is introduced, leading to substantial job losses, hundreds of millions of dollars in lost economic output and reduced tax contributions that fund public services.
States introducing iGaming face significant economic losses, with projected job cuts reaching 4921 in New York and 4733 in Illinois by 2029.
iGaming results in significant losses for states in economic output. All states analyzed would see massive GDP reductions, including Ohio ($602 million), Indiana ($428 million), Maryland ($372 million), and Colorado ($313 million).
States’ net tax gains from iGaming are limited, even before accounting for the increased social costs associated with its high rates of problem gambling and related social ills. For instance, Louisiana, Maryland, and Mississippi could all see negative net tax revenue due to displaced in-person gaming dollars and related impacts on state and local economies.
Brick-and-mortar casinos in every state would face significant revenue losses due to iGaming cannibalization. Projections reach up to $983.7 million in New York, $545.3 million in Illinois, $522.6 million in Ohio, and $342.6 million in Maryland by 2029.
The introduction of iGaming reduces in-person casino employment, with an estimated 2818 jobs lost in Ohio, 2642 in Louisiana and 1906 in Mississippi.
The job losses caused by iGaming will result in massive reductions each year in employee wages and related taxes for states. Annual labor income losses would reach nearly $110 million in Colorado and Maryland, $204 million in Ohio, nearly $300 million in Illinois, and nearly $450 million in New York.
States with iGaming experience an 8.3% decline in distributed gaming revenue, impacting taverns and small gaming establishments.
Projected U.S. gambling losses from iGaming are expected to surpass $1 trillion by 2028, straining local economies and public health resources.
“These statistics underscore the urgent need for action. iGaming’s unchecked access to gambling on cell phones is bad public policy that threatens local jobs and businesses and will cost states. When increased social costs caused by iGaming higher rates of underage and problem gambling are considered, the net tax revenue results are uniformly negative for every state,” said Mark Stewart, EVP & General Counsel of The Cordish Companies and NAAiG board member. “
“Beyond the lack of any real upside for states, iGaming puts vulnerable individuals at greater risk of problem gambling and financial instability. NAAiG is uniting stakeholders to push back and stop the spread of these harmful trends and advocate for responsible gaming policies,” said NAAiG board member Jason Gumer, Executive Vice President and General Counsel at Monarch Casino & Resort Inc.
“iGaming is eroding our communities. This isn’t just about responsible gaming—it’s about protecting local family-sustaining jobs and preventing financial harm. In Maryland alone, iGaming could cost $372 million in economic output, $342.6 million in lost casino revenue and nearly $110 million in annual wages. We must act now to protect our state and local economies nationwide,” said Shannon McCracken, Senior Director of Government Relations at Churchill Downs Incorporated and NAAIG board member.
The post New Study Reveals Economic and Social Risks of iGaming appeared first on Gaming and Gambling Industry in the Americas.
affiliate marketing
Alexandros Michas on Building Platforms, Not Pages
In the world of affiliate marketing, a little chaos is usually the norm. Managing dozens of websites across different regions often means endless firefighting. Enter Alexandros Michas, who was recently appointed as the Head of Website Operations at Media 24. In this interview, we talked with Alexandros about how he is replacing chaotic, site-by-site fixes with a single blueprint to turn standard affiliate sites into true digital platforms.
A few months ago, you were appointed as the Head of Website Operations at Media 24. To give our readers a look behind the scenes, what exactly does this role involve, and what are the main things you focus on in this position?
My job is to take the big-picture goals discussed with our CEO and figure out how we actually build them. I translate high-level business strategy into a concrete technical roadmap and take responsibility for it and everything that goes into our websites.
Day-to-day, I am leading our talented and experienced team of site managers. Together, we look at our portfolio of websites not just as platforms, but as products. We are constantly tweaking site functionality, brainstorming new product features, and upgrading the user experience. The ultimate goal is to move past standard affiliate landing pages and build something stickier. We want our websites to be the definitive, go-to destination where sports bettors in any given region don’t just visit once to find a bookmaker, but actively want to return to for value.
With dozens of websites in the portfolio, how do you prevent operational chaos? What does a scalable architecture look like for a modern affiliate house?
Honestly, if you treat every site like its own special project, you’ll drown in chaos overnight. The secret is standardisation.
Of course, every region has its own local specifics that we have to adapt to, and we do so by having locals as website managers. But underneath it all, we build everything on a single, shared blueprint. When we design a new feature, we don’t just build it for one site. We build it to level up the whole portfolio at once. It also makes expanding into a new market much easier. If a promising new region opens up tomorrow, we don’t have to start from scratch. We just drop in a product that’s already battle-tested and ready to go.
I’ve also set up teams around each GEO and manager, which include SEO specialists, content managers, and others, to ensure a smooth and efficient workflow.
Since you rely on a single blueprint, how do you manage the human element? How much freedom do your site managers have to experiment in their local markets versus sticking to the playbook?
Our site managers are the true experts in their specific regions, so they have total autonomy over their local content plans and figuring out what makes bettors in their area tick. They own that local strategy completely, while the blueprint just ensures they are building on a rock-solid foundation.
Because they are on the ground, I actually encourage them to constantly pitch product improvements. I always listen to their suggestions because a great idea shouldn’t just stay on one site. If a manager finds a feature that works incredibly well for their audience, we don’t just keep it there. We roll it into our core blueprint so the entire portfolio benefits from it.
The company has shifted toward building true digital platforms rather than just simple affiliate sites that rank. In practice, what is the biggest difference between those two approaches?
The biggest difference is value and retention. A simple affiliate site is transactional. It’s built entirely around SEO keywords just to capture a click, send the user to a sportsbook, and hope for a conversion. If Google tweaks its algorithm, that site is incredibly vulnerable because users have no real loyalty to it.
A digital platform, on the other hand, is an actual product. We aren’t just trying to get a click. We are trying to be a helpful place for the sports bettor. That means building features, community, and data hubs. It takes a lot more time and energy to maintain, but it turns a casual visitor into a loyal user. They don’t just find us on Google once. They bookmark the site and keep coming back because the product itself is valuable.
The World Cup is live right now. An event of this scale is a massive test for any affiliate. How did you approach the preparation for this global tournament from a product perspective, and what features did you ship to keep bettors engaged?
We knew the traffic spikes would be insane, so preparation actually started months ago. From a product perspective, the ultimate goal was instant utility. During a massive event like this, users want their information immediately, without any friction.
Feature-wise, we shipped an advanced match centre, a tournament bracket simulator, and worked heavily on upgrading our entire content strategy specifically for the World Cup. Because of the shared framework we talked about earlier, we didn’t have to build these tools site-by-site. Our blueprint allowed us to deploy these advanced features across all of our sports betting properties simultaneously, giving every region a premium product at the same time.
When the final whistle blows on the World Cup and we look back at the rest of 2026, what will have to happen for you to look back and say we absolutely nailed it?
On the data side, I want to look at our metrics and see a clear spike in returning users. That will be the ultimate proof that our platform strategy is actually working.
But our upgrades and feature improvements don’t just stop with the World Cup. We already have plenty of things in the pipeline, and we are planning a massive push right before the main European leagues kick off late this summer.
At the end of the day, I’ll know we nailed it if our site managers are effortlessly launching these new features, seeing the direct results of their work, and feeling like they have the absolute best tools in the industry to win their markets. That would be proof that we didn’t just build websites. We built a highly scalable affiliate product.
The post Alexandros Michas on Building Platforms, Not Pages appeared first on EE Gaming | Global iGaming & Tech Intelligence Hub.
affiliate marketing
Alexandros Michas on Building Platforms, Not Pages
In the world of affiliate marketing, a little chaos is usually the norm. Managing dozens of websites across different regions often means endless firefighting. Enter Alexandros Michas, who was recently appointed as the Head of Website Operations at Media 24. In this interview, we talked with Alexandros about how he is replacing chaotic, site-by-site fixes with a single blueprint to turn standard affiliate sites into true digital platforms.
A few months ago, you were appointed as the Head of Website Operations at Media 24. To give our readers a look behind the scenes, what exactly does this role involve, and what are the main things you focus on in this position?
My job is to take the big-picture goals discussed with our CEO and figure out how we actually build them. I translate high-level business strategy into a concrete technical roadmap and take responsibility for it and everything that goes into our websites.
Day-to-day, I am leading our talented and experienced team of site managers. Together, we look at our portfolio of websites not just as platforms, but as products. We are constantly tweaking site functionality, brainstorming new product features, and upgrading the user experience. The ultimate goal is to move past standard affiliate landing pages and build something stickier. We want our websites to be the definitive, go-to destination where sports bettors in any given region don’t just visit once to find a bookmaker, but actively want to return to for value.
With dozens of websites in the portfolio, how do you prevent operational chaos? What does a scalable architecture look like for a modern affiliate house?
Honestly, if you treat every site like its own special project, you’ll drown in chaos overnight. The secret is standardisation.
Of course, every region has its own local specifics that we have to adapt to, and we do so by having locals as website managers. But underneath it all, we build everything on a single, shared blueprint. When we design a new feature, we don’t just build it for one site. We build it to level up the whole portfolio at once. It also makes expanding into a new market much easier. If a promising new region opens up tomorrow, we don’t have to start from scratch. We just drop in a product that’s already battle-tested and ready to go.
I’ve also set up teams around each GEO and manager, which include SEO specialists, content managers, and others, to ensure a smooth and efficient workflow.
Since you rely on a single blueprint, how do you manage the human element? How much freedom do your site managers have to experiment in their local markets versus sticking to the playbook?
Our site managers are the true experts in their specific regions, so they have total autonomy over their local content plans and figuring out what makes bettors in their area tick. They own that local strategy completely, while the blueprint just ensures they are building on a rock-solid foundation.
Because they are on the ground, I actually encourage them to constantly pitch product improvements. I always listen to their suggestions because a great idea shouldn’t just stay on one site. If a manager finds a feature that works incredibly well for their audience, we don’t just keep it there. We roll it into our core blueprint so the entire portfolio benefits from it.
The company has shifted toward building true digital platforms rather than just simple affiliate sites that rank. In practice, what is the biggest difference between those two approaches?
The biggest difference is value and retention. A simple affiliate site is transactional. It’s built entirely around SEO keywords just to capture a click, send the user to a sportsbook, and hope for a conversion. If Google tweaks its algorithm, that site is incredibly vulnerable because users have no real loyalty to it.
A digital platform, on the other hand, is an actual product. We aren’t just trying to get a click. We are trying to be a helpful place for the sports bettor. That means building features, community, and data hubs. It takes a lot more time and energy to maintain, but it turns a casual visitor into a loyal user. They don’t just find us on Google once. They bookmark the site and keep coming back because the product itself is valuable.
The World Cup is live right now. An event of this scale is a massive test for any affiliate. How did you approach the preparation for this global tournament from a product perspective, and what features did you ship to keep bettors engaged?
We knew the traffic spikes would be insane, so preparation actually started months ago. From a product perspective, the ultimate goal was instant utility. During a massive event like this, users want their information immediately, without any friction.
Feature-wise, we shipped an advanced match centre, a tournament bracket simulator, and worked heavily on upgrading our entire content strategy specifically for the World Cup. Because of the shared framework we talked about earlier, we didn’t have to build these tools site-by-site. Our blueprint allowed us to deploy these advanced features across all of our sports betting properties simultaneously, giving every region a premium product at the same time.
When the final whistle blows on the World Cup and we look back at the rest of 2026, what will have to happen for you to look back and say we absolutely nailed it?
On the data side, I want to look at our metrics and see a clear spike in returning users. That will be the ultimate proof that our platform strategy is actually working.
But our upgrades and feature improvements don’t just stop with the World Cup. We already have plenty of things in the pipeline, and we are planning a massive push right before the main European leagues kick off late this summer.
At the end of the day, I’ll know we nailed it if our site managers are effortlessly launching these new features, seeing the direct results of their work, and feeling like they have the absolute best tools in the industry to win their markets. That would be proof that we didn’t just build websites. We built a highly scalable affiliate product.
The post Alexandros Michas on Building Platforms, Not Pages appeared first on Americas iGaming & Sports Betting News.
Latest News
Alexandros Michas on Building Platforms, Not Pages
In the world of affiliate marketing, a little chaos is usually the norm. Managing dozens of websites across different regions often means endless firefighting. Enter Alexandros Michas, who was recently appointed as the Head of Website Operations at Media 24. In this interview, we talked with Alexandros about how he is replacing chaotic, site-by-site fixes with a single blueprint to turn standard affiliate sites into true digital platforms.
A few months ago, you were appointed as the Head of Website Operations at Media 24. To give our readers a look behind the scenes, what exactly does this role involve, and what are the main things you focus on in this position?
My job is to take the big-picture goals discussed with our CEO and figure out how we actually build them. I translate high-level business strategy into a concrete technical roadmap and take responsibility for it and everything that goes into our websites.
Day-to-day, I am leading our talented and experienced team of site managers. Together, we look at our portfolio of websites not just as platforms, but as products. We are constantly tweaking site functionality, brainstorming new product features, and upgrading the user experience. The ultimate goal is to move past standard affiliate landing pages and build something stickier. We want our websites to be the definitive, go-to destination where sports bettors in any given region don’t just visit once to find a bookmaker, but actively want to return to for value.
With dozens of websites in the portfolio, how do you prevent operational chaos? What does a scalable architecture look like for a modern affiliate house?
Honestly, if you treat every site like its own special project, you’ll drown in chaos overnight. The secret is standardisation.
Of course, every region has its own local specifics that we have to adapt to, and we do so by having locals as website managers. But underneath it all, we build everything on a single, shared blueprint. When we design a new feature, we don’t just build it for one site. We build it to level up the whole portfolio at once. It also makes expanding into a new market much easier. If a promising new region opens up tomorrow, we don’t have to start from scratch. We just drop in a product that’s already battle-tested and ready to go.
I’ve also set up teams around each GEO and manager, which include SEO specialists, content managers, and others, to ensure a smooth and efficient workflow.
Since you rely on a single blueprint, how do you manage the human element? How much freedom do your site managers have to experiment in their local markets versus sticking to the playbook?
Our site managers are the true experts in their specific regions, so they have total autonomy over their local content plans and figuring out what makes bettors in their area tick. They own that local strategy completely, while the blueprint just ensures they are building on a rock-solid foundation.
Because they are on the ground, I actually encourage them to constantly pitch product improvements. I always listen to their suggestions because a great idea shouldn’t just stay on one site. If a manager finds a feature that works incredibly well for their audience, we don’t just keep it there. We roll it into our core blueprint so the entire portfolio benefits from it.
The company has shifted toward building true digital platforms rather than just simple affiliate sites that rank. In practice, what is the biggest difference between those two approaches?
The biggest difference is value and retention. A simple affiliate site is transactional. It’s built entirely around SEO keywords just to capture a click, send the user to a sportsbook, and hope for a conversion. If Google tweaks its algorithm, that site is incredibly vulnerable because users have no real loyalty to it.
A digital platform, on the other hand, is an actual product. We aren’t just trying to get a click. We are trying to be a helpful place for the sports bettor. That means building features, community, and data hubs. It takes a lot more time and energy to maintain, but it turns a casual visitor into a loyal user. They don’t just find us on Google once. They bookmark the site and keep coming back because the product itself is valuable.
The World Cup is live right now. An event of this scale is a massive test for any affiliate. How did you approach the preparation for this global tournament from a product perspective, and what features did you ship to keep bettors engaged?
We knew the traffic spikes would be insane, so preparation actually started months ago. From a product perspective, the ultimate goal was instant utility. During a massive event like this, users want their information immediately, without any friction.
Feature-wise, we shipped an advanced match centre, a tournament bracket simulator, and worked heavily on upgrading our entire content strategy specifically for the World Cup. Because of the shared framework we talked about earlier, we didn’t have to build these tools site-by-site. Our blueprint allowed us to deploy these advanced features across all of our sports betting properties simultaneously, giving every region a premium product at the same time.
When the final whistle blows on the World Cup and we look back at the rest of 2026, what will have to happen for you to look back and say we absolutely nailed it?
On the data side, I want to look at our metrics and see a clear spike in returning users. That will be the ultimate proof that our platform strategy is actually working.
But our upgrades and feature improvements don’t just stop with the World Cup. We already have plenty of things in the pipeline, and we are planning a massive push right before the main European leagues kick off late this summer.
At the end of the day, I’ll know we nailed it if our site managers are effortlessly launching these new features, seeing the direct results of their work, and feeling like they have the absolute best tools in the industry to win their markets. That would be proof that we didn’t just build websites. We built a highly scalable affiliate product.
-
AGCO6 days agoAGCO Fines Great Canadian Entertainment $120,000 for Using Unauthorised Gaming System Software at Four Casinos
-
Affiliate Industry5 days agoHub Affiliations Triumphs at the iGB Affiliate Awards 2026: Winner of Programme/Network Campaign of the Year
-
Latest News5 days agoN1 Partners at iGB L!VE 2026: Bringing Together Affiliates, Art and Innovation
-
Asia6 days agoThe UAE Lottery joins SAGIP outreach with Philippine Consulate and Infinite Communities
-
Canada6 days agoSt8 extends Octoplay partnership into Ontario and the UK
-
Canada6 days agoSt8 expands Octoplay aggregation deal to Ontario and the UK
-
0006 days agoBooming Games launches Booming Buffalo Hold and Win Extreme 25,000
-
Latest News6 days agoLEON announces LEON.bet Masters, a new CS2 tournament in Portugal



