Latest News
Statement by the Board of Directors of LeoVegas in relation to the public offer from MGM
The Board of Directors of LeoVegas unanimously recommends the shareholders of LeoVegas to accept the public offer from MGM of SEK 61 in cash per share.
This statement is made by the Board of Directors[1] of LeoVegas AB (publ) (the “Company” or “LeoVegas”) pursuant to Rule II.19 of the Nasdaq Stockholm Takeover Rules (the “Takeover Rules”).
Background
MGM Casino Next Lion, LLC, a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of MGM Resorts International (“MGM”), has today announced a public offer to the shareholders of LeoVegas to transfer all of their shares in LeoVegas to MGM for a consideration of SEK 61 in cash per LeoVegas share (the “Offer”). The total value of the Offer corresponds to approximately SEK 5,957 million[2]. The price of SEK 61 per share in the Offer will not be increased.
The Offer represents a premium of:
· approximately 44.1 per cent compared to the closing price of SEK 42.32 of LeoVegas shares on Nasdaq Stockholm on 29 April 2022, which was the last trading day prior to the announcement of the Offer;
· approximately 57.6 per cent compared to the volume-weighted average trading price of SEK 38.70 of LeoVegas shares on Nasdaq Stockholm during the last 30 trading days prior to the announcement of the Offer; and
· approximately 76.5 per cent compared to the volume-weighted average trading price of SEK 34.56 of LeoVegas shares on Nasdaq Stockholm during the last 180 trading days prior to the announcement of the Offer.
The acceptance period for the Offer is expected to commence on or around 3 June 2022 and expire on or around 30 August 2022.
Completion of the Offer is conditional upon, inter alia, that the Offer is accepted to such an extent that MGM becomes the owner of shares representing more than 90 per cent of the outstanding shares in LeoVegas (on a fully diluted basis), as well as all regulatory, governmental or similar clearances, approvals and decisions necessary to complete the Offer, including approvals and clearances from competition authorities, being obtained, in each case on terms which, in MGM’s opinion, are acceptable. MGM has reserved the right to waive the conditions for completion of the Offer. The Offer is not conditional upon financing. MGM has stated that it will not increase the price of SEK 61 in the Offer. By this statement, MGM cannot, in accordance with the Takeover Rules, increase the price in the Offer.
The Board of Directors of LeoVegas has given consent to MGM to offer a management incentive plan for certain key employees of LeoVegas and notes that MGM has obtained a statement from the Swedish Securities Council (Sw. Aktiemarknadsnämnden) confirming that the proposed incentive plan is compatible with the Takeover Rules (Ruling 2022:16).
The Board of Directors of LeoVegas has, at the written request of MGM, permitted MGM to carry out a due diligence review of LeoVegas in connection with the preparation of the Offer. With the exception of information that was subsequently included in LeoVegas’ Q1 report for 2022, MGM has not been provided with any inside information regarding LeoVegas in connection with the due diligence review.
MGM has obtained irrevocable undertakings to accept the Offer from the Company’s largest shareholder and Chief Executive Officer, Gustaf Hagman, and certain other shareholders[3]. Gustaf Hagman has undertaken to tender 8,050,000 shares (8.2 per cent of the outstanding shares in LeoVegas), and other shareholders have undertaken to tender a total of 6,909,281 shares in LeoVegas (7.1 per cent). Accordingly, irrevocable undertakings to accept the Offer from shareholders representing in total 14,959,281 shares (15.3 per cent) have been obtained. The irrevocable undertakings apply irrespective of whether a higher competing offer is made. The irrevocable undertakings will terminate if the Offer is not declared unconditional on or before 31 October 2022. In addition, Torsten Söderberg, who is also a Board member of LeoVegas, has stated that he is very supportive of the Offer. Torsten Söderberg and family owns 4,533,861 shares in LeoVegas (4.6 percent).
SEB Corporate Finance (“SEB”) is acting as financial adviser and Cederquist is acting as legal adviser to LeoVegas in connection with the Offer.
Process conducted by the Board of Directors
In parallel with other interested third parties contemplating public tender offers, MGM contacted LeoVegas in December 2021. The Board of Directors engaged SEB to lead the process of evaluating other parties’ interest for the Company. In February 2022, MGM submitted a non-binding offer letter to the Board of Directors of LeoVegas indicating an interest to pursue with a public offer subject to, inter alia, a satisfactory due diligence review and the Board of Directors of LeoVegas recommending the shareholders to accept the offer from MGM. The Board of Directors gave MGM permission to conduct a due diligence review. As instructed by the Board of Directors, SEB entertained parallel processes with other interested parties in the interest of creating maximum value for the shareholders in LeoVegas. Following further negotiations with the Board of Directors and SEB, MGM increased its non-binding offer, to a price level other interested parties could not match, in order to receive a recommendation from the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors’ recommendation
In its evaluation of the Offer, the Board of Directors has taken a number of factors into account which the Board of Directors deems relevant. These factors include, but are not limited to, the Company’s present strategic and financial position and the Company’s expected potential future development and thereto related opportunities and risks.
The Board of Directors notes that the Offer represents a premium of approximately 44.1 per cent compared to the closing price of SEK 42.32 of the Company’s share on Nasdaq Stockholm on 29 April 2022, which was the last trading day before the announcement of the Offer, and a premium of approximately 57.6 per cent and 76.5 per cent respectively, compared to the volume-weighted average share price for the Company’s share on Nasdaq Stockholm during the last 30 and 180 trading days, respectively, prior to the announcement.
As noted above, LeoVegas has received several indications of interest or non-binding offers concerning a potential tender offer. MGM’s offer is, in the assessment of the LeoVegas Board of Directors, the superior offer from the perspective of the shareholders. The LeoVegas Board of Directors has investigated and considered market and industry trends, and certain strategic alternatives available to LeoVegas. Such alternatives included, but were not limited to, remaining an independent listed company with a possible listing in the USA. The LeoVegas Board of Directors has also considered the risks and uncertainties associated with such alternatives.
LeoVegas operates in an industry which is characterised by, inter alia, high innovation pace, new regulation and consolidation. In this context, the Board of Directors believes that the industrial logic and strategic fit between LeoVegas and MGM is attractive and should serve both the company and its employees well in the future.
The Board of Directors further notes that LeoVegas’ largest shareholder and Chief Executive Officer Gustaf Hagman and certain other shareholders, representing in aggregate 15.3 per cent of the outstanding shares and votes in the Company, have entered into undertakings to accept the Offer, subject to certain conditions, irrespective of whether a higher competing offer is made. In addition, Torsten Söderberg, who is also a Board member of LeoVegas and together with family owns 4.6 per cent of the outstanding shares, has stated that he is very supportive of the Offer.
As part of the Board of Directors’ evaluation of the Offer, the Board of Directors has engaged BDO to issue a so-called fairness opinion regarding the Offer, see Appendix 1. According to the fairness opinion, the Offer is fair to LeoVegas’ shareholders from a financial point of view (subject to the assumptions and considerations set out in the fairness opinion).
Under the Takeover Rules, the Board of Directors shall, based on the statements made by MGM in the Offer press release issued earlier today, present its opinion regarding the impact that the implementation of the Offer will have on LeoVegas, particularly in terms of employment, and its opinion regarding MGM’s strategic plans for LeoVegas and the effects it is anticipated that such plans will have on employment and on the places in which LeoVegas conducts its business. In this respect, the Board of Directors notes that MGM has stated that “MGM values the skills and talents of LeoVegas’ management and employees and intends to continue to safeguard the excellent relationship that LeoVegas has with its employees. Given MGM’s current knowledge of LeoVegas and in light of current market conditions, MGM does not intend to materially alter the operations of LeoVegas following the implementation of the Offer, subject, of course, to MGM’s continued regulatory review. There are currently no decisions on any material changes to LeoVegas’ or MGM’s employees and management or to the existing organization and operations, including the terms of employment and locations of the business”. The Board of Directors assumes that this description is correct and has no reason to take a different view in this respect.
Based on the above, the Board of Directors unanimously recommends the shareholders in LeoVegas to accept the Offer.
This statement shall in all respects be governed by and construed in accordance with Swedish law. Disputes arising from this statement shall be settled exclusively by Swedish courts.
The information in the press release is information that LeoVegas is obliged to make public pursuant to the EU Market Abuse Regulation and the Takeover Rules. The information was submitted for publication, through the agency of the contact person set out above, at 08.00 CEST on 2 May 2022.
[1] The Board member Torsten Söderberg and the Company’s largest shareholder and Chief Executive Officer Gustaf Hagman have not participated in the Board’s evaluation of or discussions regarding the Offer due to conflict of interest.
[2] Based on 97,652,970 outstanding shares in LeoVegas, which excludes 4,000,000 treasury shares held by LeoVegas. In the event that LeoVegas should pay any dividend or make any other value transfer prior to the settlement of the Offer, the price per share in the Offer will be reduced correspondingly.
[3] LOYS AG: 3,259,281 shares (3.3 per cent). Robin Ramm-Ericson: 2,250,000 shares (2.3 per cent). Pontus Hagnö: 1,000,000 shares (1.0 per cent). Gilston Invest AB: 400,000 shares (0.4 per cent).
Powered by WPeMatico
Enjoy
Hybrid Live Casino: Where table trust meets slot‑style engagement
As the lines between gaming verticals continue to blur, operators are rethinking how live casino content earns player attention and time on site. A new category, Hybrid Live Casino, is emerging at this intersection, blending the trust and clarity of presenter‑led table games with the spectacle, progression, and feature‑driven energy traditionally associated with RNG mechanics.
One of the clearest expressions of this shift can be seen in ENJOY Gaming’s newest release Energy Roulette, which maintains the familiar cadence of classic roulette while introducing multi‑stage engagement moments, including a feature-rich, slot-style hold and win bonus round, that feel native to the live environment rather than added on.
ENJOY Gaming’s Director of Account Management, Dimokratis Papadimos, discusses the evolution of player behaviour, the commercial opportunity behind Hybrid Live formats, and what it takes for suppliers to design experiences that feel cohesive rather than gimmick‑driven.
How has player behaviour evolved in recent years, particularly in terms of crossover between slots and live casino?
Player behaviour has become far more fluid. Historically, players tended to stay within a single vertical, but that distinction is fading. Today’s player is less concerned with product categories and more focused on the quality of the experience, including the entertainment value, volatility, and engagement. What we’re seeing is a growing overlap between slot and live audiences. Slot players are increasingly exploring live environments, but they bring their expectations with them. They’re looking for feature-driven gameplay, bigger moments, and a sense of progression. At the same time, live players are becoming more open to formats that introduce additional layers of excitement beyond the traditional table experience. This convergence is creating a new type of player who expects the best elements of both worlds, rather than choosing between them.
Slots and live casino have traditionally been treated as distinct verticals. Why do you believe those boundaries are becoming less relevant today?
The distinction was largely shaped by technology and distribution. Slots were built around individual, fast-paced sessions with strong mechanics, while live casino focused on authenticity, trust, and social interaction. But those technical limitations no longer apply in the same way. Streaming quality, UI design, and game engines have evolved to the point where you can begin to blend these experiences seamlessly. More importantly, player expectations have shifted. Players don’t think in terms of “slots” or “live” – they think in terms of entertainment. If a product delivers engagement, transparency, and excitement, the underlying category becomes secondary. As a result, the traditional boundaries are no longer a constraint; they’re an opportunity.
How would you define Hybrid Live, and what makes it more than just adding features to a traditional live game?
Hybrid Live is not about layering mechanics on top of an existing product – it’s about designing a new experience from the ground up that integrates the strengths of both verticals. At its core, Hybrid Live combines three elements: the trust and presence of a live host, the structural clarity of a table game, and the engagement mechanics typically associated with slots. The key is balance. If the feature feels disconnected from the live experience, it loses credibility. If it’s too subtle, it doesn’t add value. A true hybrid is cohesive. The mechanics, pacing, and presentation are all aligned so that the experience feels natural rather than engineered. That’s what differentiates it from simple feature add-ons.
Hold & Win has been a cornerstone mechanic within slots. What are the key challenges and opportunities when adapting a mechanic like this into a presenter-led live format?
Hold & Win has proven to be highly effective within slot games by creating anticipation and a sense of progression, but translating that to a live environment requires careful design. The biggest challenge is preserving the integrity of the live experience. Players need to feel that the game remains transparent and presenter-led, rather than dominated by a feature that could feel detached or overly complex. Timing is also critical. In slots, everything is immediate. In live, pacing must work both for the player triggering the feature and the wider audience watching. The opportunity, however, is significant. When adapted correctly, Hold & Win introduces a multi-stage win journey into live casino – a concept that has traditionally been missing. It transforms a single outcome into an event, building tension and engagement over time. This is where formats like Energy Roulette demonstrate the potential: the base game remains familiar, but the moment of a win becomes more immersive and dynamic.
From an operator perspective, what commercial advantages can hybrid live formats offer in terms of engagement, cross-sell, and differentiation?
Hybrid formats open up several commercial advantages. First, they naturally support cross-sell by appealing to both slot and live audiences within a single product. This reduces friction for players who may be hesitant to switch verticals. Second, they tend to drive deeper engagement. Feature-based gameplay introduces longer session times and more memorable moments, which can positively impact retention. Finally, there is a clear differentiation benefit. The live casino space is highly competitive, and many products follow similar structures. Hybrid Live allows operators to offer something distinctive without moving away from trusted formats like roulette or blackjack. It’s not about replacing existing products – it’s about expanding the portfolio with experiences that stand out.
Do you see Hybrid Live as a short-term innovation cycle, or part of a longer-term evolution in how live casino is designed and consumed? Where does ENJOY see this category developing over the next few years?
This is part of a longer-term structural evolution rather than a short-term trend. The convergence across verticals is driven by player expectations, which will continue to evolve. Looking ahead, we expect Hybrid Live to become a defined category in its own right, with more sophisticated mechanics, stronger visual identity, and deeper levels of interactivity. The challenge for developers will be maintaining simplicity and accessibility while introducing richer experiences. At ENJOY, the focus is on building formats that feel intuitive, scalable, and commercially viable for operators. The goal is not to innovate for the sake of it, but to create products that genuinely reflect how players want to engage with live casino today. Energy Roulette is an early example of that direction, but the broader ambition is to continue exploring how proven mechanics can be reimagined in a live context in a way that feels both authentic and forward-looking.
A strong example of this principle in practice is ENJOY Gaming’s Energy Roulette, which was designed from the outset as a unified hybrid experience rather than a standard table game with bolt-on features. Its live-presented flow remains structurally identical to classic roulette, yet the game introduces organically integrated moments — including a multi-phase Hold & Win bonus round — that elevate the emotional rhythm of play without disrupting familiarity. This illustrates how hybrid mechanics can enhance the genre while still preserving the trust, presence, and clarity that define live casino experiences.
Energy Roulette highlights how this adaptation can succeed when executed thoughtfully. The transition into the Hold & Win feature is triggered within the natural cadence of roulette play, creating a shared event that both the triggering player and the wider audience can follow in real time. The feature maintains the core appeal of Hold & Win — incremental progression, escalating anticipation, and clear win visibility — while remaining fully anchored in a presenter-led environment. This demonstrates how a mechanic traditionally associated with RNG slots can be reimagined in a way that feels live-native rather than imported.
The post Hybrid Live Casino: Where table trust meets slot‑style engagement appeared first on Eastern European Gaming | Global iGaming & Tech Intelligence Hub.
AI
Table Trac Introduces Patent-Pending Artificial Intelligence Technology for Table Games
Table Trac Inc. (TBTC) has received patent-pending status from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for its proprietary AI-driven Table Games Manager / Manager Trainer. The system leverages machine learning trained on decades of table games transactional data and pit player data to create distinct player personas designed to challenge both human pit managers and artificial intelligence systems.
The solution is delivered through a realistic gaming floor simulation environment, allowing the generation of a simulated gaming floor to be configured. Each training session utilizes a randomized mix of the player personas, creating a continually changing set of scenarios that never repeat. This approach enables trainees to compete head-to-head against the AI, optimize floor decisions to improve yield, and better understand the factors driving each decision.
While initially developed for table games management and training, the underlying artificial intelligence, simulation, and decision support framework has broader applicability across the CasinoTrac platform. Management is exploring additional use cases for this technology across the Company’s suite of casino management solutions, reinforcing CasinoTrac’s long-term product roadmap and innovation strategy.
The post Table Trac Introduces Patent-Pending Artificial Intelligence Technology for Table Games appeared first on Americas iGaming & Sports Betting News.
iGaming
N1 Insights April’s iGaming Trends You Shouldn’t Miss
April reflects changes that began taking shape in iGaming back in the first quarter, but are only now becoming systemic. The market is gradually shifting away from short-term optimization toward more complex strategies, where performance sustainability, GEO diversification, and a reassessment of affiliate model efficiency play a key role.
In this issue of N1 Insights, N1 Partners experts analyze how traffic structures are evolving and which scaling approaches continue to deliver results amid increasing competition.
Part 1
1. Traffic and performance
1.1 Traffic sources most likely to show the highest volatility in April
The highest volatility is expected from Facebook, TikTok, and PPC channels, as they are directly affected by changes in moderation, algorithms, and competitive activity. Additional fluctuations are anticipated in Google UAC, where auction costs traditionally increase in April due to intensified brand activity following the end of the first quarter.
1.2 Will brands shift their priorities between traffic volume and quality in April?
In April, many brands will begin shifting their focus toward traffic quality, based on first-quarter performance insights. Priority will be given to deeper metrics – from FTD to deposits and LTV – rather than simply chasing registration volume and initial conversions.
At the same time, in certain high-growth GEOs, there will still be a willingness to invest in volume in order to capture market share more quickly, even at the expense of short-term efficiency.
1.3 What will be more challenging in April: finding new scalable setups or maintaining current volumes?
Most likely, maintaining current volumes will become more challenging, especially in highly competitive GEOs. After an active first quarter, many proven setups are already overheated, while traffic costs continue to rise.
Finding new setups remains possible; however, scaling them will take more time due to increased competition and higher requirements for traffic quality.
1.4 Changes in testing strategies for new GEOs and traffic sources in April
Affiliates are likely to shift toward shorter testing cycles and reduce test budget volumes in order to adapt more quickly to changing market conditions.
“At the same time, interest in traffic source diversification will increase: beyond the classic Facebook and Google channels, we expect a growing number of tests in alternative social platforms,” comments Vlad Chernov, Deputy Head of Affiliates at N1 Partners.
1.5 Key metrics for scaling up or cutting caps
Key metrics will continue to include CR, ROAS, ARPU, retention, and player LTV, but their role in decision-making will become even more significant. Teams will increasingly shift from evaluating “input” metrics to analyzing audience quality and long-term value.
In particular, scaling decisions will be based on early LTV signals and user behavior patterns, rather than solely on FTD volume. This will allow teams to identify underperforming setups earlier and reallocate budgets toward more sustainable traffic sources.
2. GEO priorities
2.1 GEOs that may see the highest traffic growth in April
In April, several Tier-1 countries are expected to show the strongest growth, primarily Canada, Germany, and Australia, where demand for online gambling remains stable and major brands continue to increase their marketing budgets. Growth may also be observed in Latin America (Brazil, Peru, Chile).
At the same time, some affiliates will continue scaling in Eastern Europe and CIS countries, where competition is lower than in Tier-1 markets and it is easier to test new setups.
2.2 Will the approach to Tier-1 markets change compared to Q1 2026?
The approach to GEO selection will become more selective and pragmatic. Many teams will maintain their focus on Tier-1 markets, but with stricter ROI control amid rising traffic costs and decreasing predictability of results.
At the same time, a partial budget reallocation is expected in favor of GEOs with more favorable scaling conditions – lower competition and more affordable auction dynamics. As a result, strategies will increasingly balance between the stability of Tier-1 markets and growth opportunities in less saturated regions.
2.3 Regions where the cost of player acquisition is expected to change the most
The most noticeable increase in CPA is expected in Tier-1 markets – primarily Canada, Germany, and Australia. In these GEOs, player acquisition costs are likely to continue rising amid intense competition and increasing pressure from large media buying teams.
“An additional factor will be the concentration of budgets after the first quarter: major players are scaling more aggressively, which overheats the auction and reduces the effectiveness of standard traffic acquisition approaches,” notes Vlad Chernov, Deputy Head of Affiliates at N1 Partners.
As a result, the entry threshold for new campaigns is rising, and achieving target metrics will require more precise optimization and stronger setups.
2.4 Key GEOs for growth at the beginning of Q2
Key GEOs may include several Tier-1 markets such as Canada, Germany, and Australia, as well as a number of Tier-2 and Tier-3 countries, including Brazil, India, Turkey, Kazakhstan, and Chile.
These countries remain a priority for many brands due to strong purchasing power, higher player LTV, and stable demand for licensed products. Despite high competition and traffic costs, Tier-1 markets continue to attract large affiliate teams, as with proper optimization they offer the most sustainable long-term profitability.
3. Affiliate Marketing Dynamics
3.1 How will the balance between new partners and established affiliate teams change in April?
The market will continue to consolidate around large and experienced teams that have the resources for scaling, optimization, and rapid budget reallocation. Their advantage will strengthen due to accumulated expertise, access to data, and more stable traffic acquisition processes.
At the same time, new teams will continue to emerge; however, the barrier to entry will keep rising. Without access to unique traffic sources, technological advantages, or niche expertise, it will become increasingly difficult for them to compete with established players and reach comparable volumes.
3.2 Changes in affiliates’ approach to selecting partner brands
Affiliates are increasingly shifting their focus toward non-financial factors when choosing partners – primarily brand reputation, payment reliability, and transparency of statistics. These criteria are becoming critical amid rising risks and the instability of certain offers.
As a result, the trend toward long-term partnerships is strengthening: more teams are favoring sustainable collaboration models over short-term offers with potentially high but unpredictable payouts.
“This approach reduces operational risks and enables building a more stable long-term unit economics,” says Vlad Chernov, Deputy Head of Affiliates at N1 Partners.
3.3 Types of partners that will see the most active growth in April
Media buying teams working with paid traffic will continue to grow most actively, along with content affiliates and SEO-driven projects focused on long-term organic traffic acquisition. These models remain key due to their scalability and more predictable long-term economics.
At the same time, growth in alternative sources is accelerating – particularly influencer and Telegram traffic, which attract affiliates with help of flexibility, a lower barrier to entry, and the ability to test hypotheses more quickly.
3.4 What changes in partner behavior are likely to be most noticeable in April?
Partners will increasingly diversify their traffic sources and GEOs to reduce dependence on any single channel. More cautious scaling and deeper analysis of unit economics can also be expected, especially in light of first-quarter results.
Part 2
1. PR trends
1.1 Top PR trends in April 2026
In the second quarter, PR activity noticeably picks up: after revisiting strategies at the beginning of the year, brands start engaging more actively with media and building more structured communication. Against the backdrop of increasing competition, having a strong offer alone is no longer enough – what matters is how the brand presents itself and what it communicates.
“At the same time, formats are also evolving: traditional press releases are gradually taking a back seat, giving way to case studies, interviews, and more ‘authentic’ content,” says Maria Bobrovskaya, Team Lead PR, Event, Production at N1 Partners.
The market is saturated, so those who deliver real value and communicate with their audience not in abstract terms, but through experience and concrete results, are the ones who win.
2. Brand marketing strategy
2.1 Which aspects of marketing strategy should brands focus on in April amid increasing competition?
The key focus should be on differentiation through brand positioning, not just through offer terms. In a market saturated with similar propositions, partners begin to make decisions based not only on numbers, but also on trust and stability.
This is reflected in affiliate behavior: strong partners are more likely to work with brands that have a clear reputation and predictable processes.
2.2 What changes in marketing strategy should brands consider in April to maintain a competitive advantage?
Companies are gradually shifting their focus from short-term acquisition to long-term partner retention, strengthening efforts in content, PR, loyalty programs, and community development. This approach not only reduces dependence on a constant influx of new affiliates but also improves the quality of engagement with existing partners.
This shift is largely driven by market saturation: acquisition costs continue to rise, while competition for active affiliates intensifies.
“In such conditions, retaining and developing the existing partner base becomes strategically more effective than aggressively acquiring new partners, especially given the increasing demands for transparency, support, and level of service,” notes Maria Bobrovskaya, Team Lead PR, Event, Production at N1 Partners.
2.3 How can marketers find the right balance between short-term results and long-term brand development?
The balance is achieved through a combined strategy: performance drives immediate results, while brand communications ensure long-term stability. If a brand focuses only on short-term gains, it becomes vulnerable in a highly competitive environment.
2.4 The most effective approaches to marketing budget allocation in Q2
In the second quarter, many companies begin reallocating budgets toward a more diversified strategy. In addition to performance channels, there is increased investment in PR activities, content marketing, and event participation.
This shift is driven by the fact that relying solely on paid traffic is becoming less stable, prompting brands to seek ways to strengthen their organic presence and build trust.
- Marketing challenges
3.1 What new challenges may marketing teams face at the beginning of Q2?
The key challenge remains the growing competition for partner attention, making it increasingly difficult for brands to differentiate themselves amid similar terms and offers. In an oversaturated market, standard acquisition tools are no longer delivering consistent results.
As a result, marketing teams are forced to shift their focus from purely commercial terms to building reputation, improving communication quality, and shaping overall brand perception. This includes more systematic work with content, greater transparency in interactions, and the development of long-term relationships with partners.
3.2 Which marketing strategies may become less effective in April?
Approaches based solely on financial terms are gradually losing effectiveness. When many programs offer similar payouts, partners begin to pay attention to other factors – such as brand reputation, quality of support, and operational stability.
3.3 Will it become more difficult to attract strong partners amid the large number of affiliate programs on the market?
This is largely due to the fact that strong affiliates have already formed a stable pool of partners and have become significantly more selective when choosing new brands. Decisions are increasingly made not only based on terms, but also considering reputation, stability, and quality of interaction.
In practice, this results in a longer onboarding cycle: new programs require more time to pass the evaluation stage and build trust. As a result, partnership launches slow down, and affiliate expectations become more demanding.
3.4 What signals in April may indicate that brands should reconsider their marketing strategy?
A decline in partner engagement, weak response to new products, and lack of brand visibility in the media are key signals.
“This is due to the fact that in a highly competitive environment, even a slight drop in activity quickly impacts a brand’s position,” says Maria Bobrovskaya, Team Lead PR, Event, Production at N1 Partners.
April confirms a key shift in the iGaming market: increasing competition and rising traffic costs are driving higher demands for quality, sustainability, and a more strategic approach to marketing. Quick tactics and short-term solutions are gradually giving way to more systematic efforts – with a focus on LTV, partner retention, and traffic source diversification.
Join the first tournament of the N1 Traffic Cups 2026 series – the N1 SEO Traffic Cup by N1 Partners!
Period: March 1 – April 30, 2026
Results: by May 10
Entry: from 20 FTD per brand
Why N1 Partners:
- 14+ casino and sportsbook brands with Reg2Dep up to 70%
- 10+ Tier-1 GEOs
- CPA up to €700 and RevShare up to 45% + NNCO for top partners + hybrid models
Be number one with N1!
The post N1 Insights April’s iGaming Trends You Shouldn’t Miss appeared first on Eastern European Gaming | Global iGaming & Tech Intelligence Hub.
-
Canada7 days agoSoft2Bet Evaluates Alberta Market Entry to Strengthen its Canadian Footprint
-
ANJL7 days agoBrazil betting market adjusts to regulation as football sponsorship boom slows
-
AiGC7 days agoSoft2Bet Eyes Alberta iGaming Market Expansion in Canada
-
Games Global6 days agoGames Global and Stormcraft Studios dive into aquatic adventure with Mermaid’s Millions Cashingo™
-
Edvardas Sadovskis CPO at ICONIC216 days agoPatrick’s Lucky Fortune by ICONIC21 Rolls Out to Power Operator Growth and Seasonal Offers
-
Alex Fonseca CEO Superbet Brazil6 days agoFluminense and Superbet Renew Their Partnership
-
Africa5 days agoBetConstruct AI to Drive Global Innovation and Strategic Growth AcrossKey Markets in LatAm, Asia, and Africa
-
ANJL7 days agoApuestas en Brasil: la regulación enfría el boom de patrocinios en el fútbol



