Brazil
Brazil intensifies debate on betting regulation as Lula criticizes online gambling
President’s remarks raise concerns across the regulated betting sector
Brazil’s political debate over sports betting intensified after President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva suggested that online gambling could face stricter restrictions or even a potential ban in the future.
During a national radio and television address on March 8, the president defended the creation of legislation that could limit or prohibit online betting activity in the country.
According to specialized outlet BNLData, industry representatives and legal experts warned that such measures could have significant economic consequences and potentially strengthen the illegal gambling market.
Plínio Lemos Jorge, president of the National Association of Games and Lotteries (ANJL), argued that the main issue is not regulated platforms but the large number of illegal operators currently outside government oversight.
Analysts also noted that the uncertainty generated by the president’s remarks could impact international investment. According to reports cited by the industry, at least two global suppliers have already reconsidered plans to establish operations in Brazil.
The potential impact could extend to the labor market as well. Industry estimates suggest that up to 40,000 direct jobs could be affected if a ban on online betting were implemented.
Licensed operators could also pursue legal action to protect their rights, considering that each company paid approximately $6 million for authorization to operate in the Brazilian market.
Brazilian sports could also face consequences. In 2025 alone, betting companies invested roughly $220 million in football sponsorships, with 13 of the 20 Serie A clubs currently featuring betting operators as their main shirt sponsors.
The sector also highlighted its growing fiscal contribution. According to industry data, online betting generated around $2.9 billion in taxes and contributions in 2025, supporting several public programs.
Given these factors, analysts argue that Brazil’s policy debate should focus on strengthening regulation and combating illegal operators rather than adopting prohibitionist measures that could push players toward unregulated platforms.
Advertising restrictions and public funding proposals shape the regulatory agenda
Brazil’s sports betting industry is currently facing an intense political and regulatory debate.
Just over a year after the country implemented the legal framework that formally regulated the sector, lawmakers are discussing a series of bills that could significantly reshape the market.
Among the most prominent proposals are restrictions on betting advertising, limitations on influencer marketing campaigns, bans on bets related to electoral processes and new mechanisms to channel betting revenues into public programs.
The debate reflects the growing political visibility of an industry that has expanded rapidly since regulation was introduced.
With millions of active bettors and billions of dollars circulating monthly, sports betting has become an important economic player in Brazil, particularly across sports, media and entertainment.
At the same time, the sector’s rapid growth has raised concerns among legislators about its social impact, advertising exposure and the need for clearer limits on commercial strategies used by betting platforms.
Senate discusses stricter advertising rules
One of the central topics in Brazil’s Congress is a proposal to introduce stricter restrictions on sports betting advertising.
A bill currently under discussion would prohibit advertising by betting operators across several media channels, restrict promotional partnerships with digital influencers and ban wagers related to electoral processes.
The proposal was introduced by Senator Randolfe Rodrigues and is currently being reviewed by Senator Damares Alves.
It has already been approved by the Senate’s Science and Technology Committee and will now be analyzed by the Constitution and Justice Committee (CCJ) before potentially moving to a plenary vote.
If approved, the legislation would establish one of the strictest advertising frameworks for the betting sector in Brazil. The bill proposes amendments to Laws 13.756/2018 and 14.790/2023, which currently regulate the market.
Violations could lead to significant penalties, including fines of up to US$2 million, as well as temporary suspension or even revocation of operating licenses.
Potential impact on Brazilian football
Advertising restrictions have raised concerns among football clubs and entertainment industry stakeholders, as sponsorship deals with betting companies have become one of the most important commercial revenue streams for Brazilian football.
Industry estimates indicate that betting companies invested more than $220 million in sponsorship agreements with Serie A clubs during 2025.
For 2026, sponsorship spending is expected to remain close to $200 million, with the majority of top-tier teams maintaining partnerships with betting operators.
Currently, 14 clubs in Brazil’s first division have sponsorship deals with betting companies, and 13 feature betting brands as their primary shirt sponsor.
The Brazilian Institute of Responsible Gaming (IBJR) estimates that clubs receive on average 2.6 times more revenue from betting sponsorships than from competition prize money.
Industry representatives warn that a broad advertising ban could significantly affect the financial structure of Brazilian football.
Industry warns of unintended consequences
Several executives within the betting sector have raised concerns about the consequences of a broad advertising ban.
According to operators, commercial communication plays a key role in helping consumers distinguish regulated platforms from illegal sites operating outside government oversight.
Recent studies suggest that the illegal betting market continues to maintain a significant presence in Brazil.
A report by Yield Sec estimated that illegal operators handled around $3.6 billion in wagers during the first half of 2025 alone.
During the same period, the government may have lost approximately $920 million in tax revenue due to unregulated activity.
Industry estimates suggest that unauthorized platforms could represent up to 49% of Brazil’s total online betting market.
Operators argue that restricting advertising could make it harder for consumers to identify licensed brands, potentially benefiting illegal operators that do not comply with Brazilian regulations.
Betting revenues proposed as funding source for healthcare
While some lawmakers are seeking to limit betting activities, others are exploring ways to use the sector as a funding source for social programs.
One notable proposal, introduced by Senator Dra. Eudócia, would allow philanthropic healthcare institutions to operate fixed-odds betting platforms.
Under the proposal, philanthropic hospitals, health organizations and charities that provide services to Brazil’s public healthcare system (SUS) could obtain betting licenses.
Unlike commercial operators, these institutions would be exempt from paying the licensing fee required to enter the market.
The bill stipulates that all net revenue generated by these betting operations must be used exclusively to fund healthcare initiatives, including purchasing medicines, medical equipment and improving hospital infrastructure.
To ensure transparency, the proposal requires organizations to maintain separate accounting for betting-related operations.
The initiative draws inspiration from international models where regulated gambling revenues support social programs.
Public security funding also enters the debate
The betting sector has also entered discussions about funding public security programs.
A constitutional amendment proposal approved in Brazil’s Chamber of Deputies would allocate 30% of betting tax revenue to the National Public Security Fund.
Camilla Pintarelli, director of the fund, stated that the measure could represent an important step toward ensuring stable resources for public security policies, particularly in regions facing structural challenges.
In 2025, approximately $100 million were removed from the fund due to fiscal mechanisms that allowed the government to reallocate resources, a situation that generated criticism from public security specialists.
A market that continues to grow
Since the betting regulation officially came into force in January 2025, Brazil’s sports betting market has experienced rapid expansion.
Data from Brazil’s Central Bank indicates that bettors wagered between $4 billion and $6 billion per month during 2025.
The sector generated approximately $7.4 billion in gross revenue that year and attracted dozens of international operators interested in entering the Brazilian market.
Currently, the Brazilian government has authorized 84 companies to operate in the country, representing 185 different betting brands.
Each operator paid approximately $6 million for a license, in addition to meeting regulatory requirements established by the Secretariat of Prizes and Betting within the Ministry of Finance.
Outlook for the sector
As the market continues to evolve, political debate over the role of betting in Brazil’s economy is expected to intensify.
The legislative proposals currently under discussion reflect different views on how to balance economic growth with consumer protection and social responsibility.
While some lawmakers advocate stricter advertising restrictions and tighter marketing rules, others see the industry as an opportunity to finance strategic sectors such as healthcare and public security.
Ultimately, the future of Brazil’s betting market will depend not only on the performance of licensed operators but also on the regulatory decisions taken by Congress in the coming months.
The post Brazil intensifies debate on betting regulation as Lula criticizes online gambling appeared first on Americas iGaming & Sports Betting News.
TJPE cites a Brasília federal ruling that suspended the legal effects of Spribe’s AVIATOR registration and barred exclusivity claims during nullity proceedings.
The Court of Justice of Pernambuco (TJPE) has revoked preliminary appellate relief previously granted to Spribe OÜ in litigation over the AVIATOR trademark in Brazil.
In a monocratic decision, Justice Andrea Epaminondas Tenorio de Brito held that the factual and legal basis for the earlier injunction no longer exists. The court pointed to a subsequent decision by the Federal Court in Brasília that provisionally suspended the legal effects of Spribe’s Brazilian AVIATOR trademark registration and ordered Spribe to refrain from asserting exclusivity based on that registration while federal nullity proceedings are ongoing.
TJPE said its earlier relief relied on the presumption that Spribe’s trademark registration before Brazil’s National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) was fully valid and enforceable. With the federal court suspending the registration’s effects, the Pernambuco court found the underlying circumstances had materially changed.
The court cited Article 296 of the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure as the basis for revoking the preliminary relief in light of the changed legal situation.
The post Pernambuco court revokes Spribe’s interim relief in Aviator trademark dispute appeared first on EE Gaming | Global iGaming & Tech Intelligence Hub.
The Court of Justice of Pernambuco (TJPE) has revoked preliminary appellate relief previously granted to Spribe OÜ in ongoing litigation over the use of the AVIATOR trademark in Brazil, citing a change in the legal circumstances supporting the earlier decision.
In a monocratic decision, Justice Andrea Epaminondas Tenorio de Brito concluded that the factual and legal basis for the prior injunction no longer exists. The ruling follows a decision by the Federal Court in Brasília that provisionally suspended the legal effects of Spribe’s Brazilian AVIATOR trademark registration.
According to the press release, the federal court also ordered Spribe to refrain from asserting exclusivity based on that registration until the federal nullity proceedings are resolved.
TJPE said its earlier decision had relied on the presumption that Spribe’s trademark registration with the Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) was fully valid and enforceable. With the federal court now suspending the legal effects of that registration, the Pernambuco court held that the foundation for interim relief had materially changed, prompting revocation under Article 296 of the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure.
The post Pernambuco court revokes Spribe interim relief in AVIATOR trademark dispute appeared first on Americas iGaming & Sports Betting News.
Looking beyond Brazil, which LatAm market stands out most right now, and what makes it attractive?
Liam Hoofe, Content Strategist at GameOn
Based on our research for GO Intel, I think Chile is the market to watch out for the most. The size of the opportunity is potentially massive, with the Chilean Senate’s own figures estimating that more than 5 million Chileans are already gambling online.
The demand is definitely there, and broader discussions about a regulatory framework are underway. Our estimates in GO Intel also put channelisation rates at 80% if enforcement and regulation ran smoothly.
The proposed ‘cooling-off’ period for operators already active there is also quite a unique approach, and it will benefit those who approach the market with the right foundations in place.
Of course, as we’ve seen with Brazil, there will no doubt be a lot of public debate around the market, and the tax structure could be complex, but of the three we researched, this one still stands out the most.
Paulina Hovar, Lead Sales Manager LATAM at BGaming
Right now, Mexico and Argentina stand out the most to me.
Mexico has been showing steady growth for a while now. It’s already a fairly mature market with strong operator presence, but there’s still plenty of room to scale. At the same time, one of the main things to watch is the tax situation and how regulation may develop in the future, since that could impact profitability and market dynamics.
Argentina is interesting for a different reason. The market is regulated at the provincial level, so it’s much more decentralized. That creates opportunities because entry can be more flexible, but it also means you need to understand the local landscape and choose partners and regions carefully.
Ramiro Atucha, Board Advisor to Kiron Interactive
Mexico stands out. The size of the market alone makes it attractive, and the current regulation is already acceptable enough for public companies to feel comfortable operating there. It’s also moving toward a more formal framework, so there’s still margin to grow. Beyond Mexico, I’d point to Chile, certain provinces in Argentina, and Colombia. All three have their own dynamics, but they’re markets you can’t ignore right now.
When entering markets that are still evolving from a regulatory perspective, what’s the right balance between moving early and waiting for clarity?
Liam Hoofe, Content Strategist at GameOn
That’s the million-dollar question, and it’s one I’m not sure there is a 100% correct answer to. For me, it’s about building relationships, ensuring you have the right infrastructure in place, and understanding a market before you invest.
Operators and studios that just enter with no understanding of the culture and of the way the regulatory landscape could adapt are putting themselves at risk of failing.
Trying to remain one step ahead of regulation and working alongside the regulators to help the market mature is always going to be a much better approach than just waiting for regulation to come into place and being reactive.
Paulina Hovar, Lead Sales Manager LATAM at BGaming
It depends on how mature the market is.
If the regulatory framework is already clear and established, then the best approach is to operate fully within the licensed model from day one.
But in markets that are still in a gray or transitional stage, where operators are already active, it can make sense to take a more gradual approach. That could mean building partnerships, adapting the product to local needs, and preparing for future regulation before fully committing.
You also have to be very careful about legal and reputational risks. Every market is different, so timing and level of involvement should be assessed on a case-by-case basis.
Ramiro Atucha, Board Advisor to Kiron Interactive
As early as possible, as long as it isn’t illegal or forbidden. That’s the right moment to enter and transition through the regulatory process. Brazil is the clearest example. Sports betting was legalized in 2018, but the full regulatory framework only came in late 2023, with licensed operations starting in 2025. The operators that used those years to attract players, test the market and build name recognition without breaking the law made a real difference. By the time regulation arrived, they were already established.
As markets like Chile, Peru, and Uruguay develop, what will separate the brands that succeed from those that struggle?
Liam Hoofe, Content Strategist at GameOn
The biggest differentiator for me is localisation, and by that, I mean real localisation, not just translating a game into Spanish and calling it a day. This means actually creating products and promotions that speak to local audiences. LatAm is not just some big monolithic market with a one-size-fits-all solution – brands that succeed there are the ones that understand this. The ones who know that a player in Chile is not the same as one in Uruguay or Brazil are going to be the big winners.
On top of that, working closely with regulators and showing genuine concern for players’ well-being in these markets will make a huge difference. It’s not enough anymore to just display simple responsible gambling tools; players want to see it in your actions, and it’s obvious to them which brands really care and which are just ticking boxes.
And finally, local partnerships. Some of the most successful companies we work with are those that really integrate themselves and find local partners that offer genuine insight into communities, and can be leveraged to build trust. This can be achieved in a number of different ways, whether it’s through working with local content creators and influencers or getting involved with local charities and events.
Paulina Hovar, Lead Sales Manager LATAM at BGaming
As markets like Chile, Peru, and Uruguay continue to develop, the following three factors will set successful brands apart from the rest.
First, strong local partnerships. Without people on the ground and a real understanding of how each market works, it’s very difficult to build a sustainable position.
Second, product adaptation. Translation alone is never enough. Companies need proper localization that reflects user behavior, cultural differences, and local audience preferences.
And third, regulatory readiness. The companies that invest early in certification, compliance, and building the right processes will have a major advantage later on. It’s expensive and takes time, but in regulated markets, long-term preparation usually makes the difference between short-term growth and lasting success.
Ramiro Atucha, Board Advisor to Kiron Interactive
Brands that bring international experience and proven competitiveness from other markets, combined with genuine local understanding, will get the best of both worlds. The international background gives you credibility and product depth. The local presence gives you a product that’s actually adapted to how players in that country behave. Neither side works on its own. In Chile, Peru, and Uruguay, the operators who get this combination right are the ones who’ll separate from the pack.
The post LatAm: Beyond Brazil – Chile, Uruguay and Peru’s Regulatory Trajectories appeared first on Americas iGaming & Sports Betting News.
-
AGCO7 days agoAGCO Fines Great Canadian Entertainment $120,000 for Using Unauthorised Gaming System Software at Four Casinos
-
Affiliate Industry5 days ago
Hub Affiliations Triumphs at the iGB Affiliate Awards 2026: Winner of Programme/Network Campaign of the Year
-
Canada7 days ago
St8 extends Octoplay partnership into Ontario and the UK
-
Latest News5 days ago
N1 Partners at iGB L!VE 2026: Bringing Together Affiliates, Art and Innovation
-
Asia7 days ago
The UAE Lottery joins SAGIP outreach with Philippine Consulate and Infinite Communities
-
0007 days ago
Booming Games launches Booming Buffalo Hold and Win Extreme 25,000
-
Latest News7 days ago
LEON announces LEON.bet Masters, a new CS2 tournament in Portugal
-
Canada7 days ago
St8 expands Octoplay aggregation deal to Ontario and the UK
