22Bet Partners has launched a new social media giveaway designed to welcome new affiliates into its global partner network — this time with a €10,000 total prize pool waiting to be claimed.

The campaign, hosted on the company’s official Instagram page and running until April 15, will select ten winners, each receiving €1,000 credited to their affiliate account. The initiative offers new partners an opportunity to join the program while boosting their starting affiliate balance from day one.

Participation in the campaign follows a simple format familiar to anyone active on social media. To enter the giveaway, participants need to complete three steps:

• Follow the official 22Bet Partners Instagram page

• Register in the 22Bet Partners Affiliate Program via the campaign link

• Like the giveaway post

Once the campaign concludes, ten winners will be randomly selected from participants who completed all steps and liked the post. Selected users will be contacted directly and asked to provide their Affiliate ID so the reward can be credited to their affiliate account.

More detailed participation rules and conditions can be found in the official giveaway post on the 22Bet Partners Instagram page.

The promotion is available exclusively to new affiliates joining the 22Bet Partners program. The initiative reflects the brand’s ongoing focus on expanding its global affiliate network and supporting partners who choose to grow alongside the platform.

General 22Bet Partners Terms & Conditions apply to this promotion.

Global esports prize pools exceeded $270 million in 2025, a 15.5% increase year-over-year, according to new research from eSportRanker. Despite this growth, prize money remains concentrated. Saudi Arabia, China and the US together hosted roughly half of all prize money across the world’s top ten esports nations, highlighting how a few markets dominate major tournament hosting.

The analysis draws on Esports Charts host-country data covering more than 10,500 tournaments across 100+ esports titles worldwide. The research examines not only how much prize money was distributed, but where tournaments were hosted and what structural factors allowed certain countries to rise to the top.

Saudi Arabia ranked first globally with $39.66 million in hosted prize pools, driven largely by the Esports World Cup circuit in Riyadh, which staged tournaments across titles including Dota 2, PUBG Mobile, Mobile Legends: Bang Bang and Honor of Kings.

China ranked second with $34.82 million, supported by its publisher-controlled domestic league system, including Tencent’s King Pro League Grand Finals 2025, which alone carried a prize pool of nearly $10 million.

The US placed third with $23.12 million, reflecting a diversified esports ecosystem with tournaments across multiple publishers and game genres.

The top ten countries by hosted esports prize pools in 2025 were:

Saudi Arabia — $39.66M

China — $34.82M

United States — $23.12M

Romania — $7.79M

France — $7.57M

Thailand — $7.11M

Canada — $5.28M

Germany — $5.22M

South Korea — $5.03M

Japan — $4.28M

Beyond the leading three markets, prize money drops sharply. The remaining seven countries together accounted for just over $47 million, illustrating the concentration at the top of the global esports hosting landscape.

The research also highlights several structural patterns behind these rankings. Sovereign investment programmes, such as those in Saudi Arabia, can rapidly elevate a country’s esports position. Publisher-controlled ecosystems, as seen in China, generate recurring prize pools. Meanwhile, countries like Romania and Germany reached the top ten by consistently hosting international events rather than relying on single flagship tournaments.

The post Global Esports Prize Pools Exceed $270M in 2025 appeared first on Eastern European Gaming | Global iGaming & Tech Intelligence Hub.

The House of Commons was reminded last week that the decisions it took could have “a huge impact” on Gibraltar, as a Labour MP warned that a planned increase to UK gaming taxes could “leave a huge hole” in the Rock’s economy.

Gareth Snell used a Commons debate on the Finance Bill to warn that changes to the UK’s remote gaming and remote betting duty could have a significant impact on Gibraltar’s public finances, and that higher costs in the regulated sector risked driving more gamblers into the black market.

Mr Snell tabled an amendment to the Bill requiring the UK Government to conduct an impact assessment on Gibraltar, whose economy he said was heavily reliant on the gaming and gambling sector.

Citing his discussions with Nigel Feetham, Gibraltar’s Minister for Trade, Industry and Justice, Mr Snell said the gaming accounts for 30% of Gibraltar’s GDP, employs 3500 people and generates one third of Gibraltar’s tax receipts.

He said companies with a footprint in Gibraltar pay Gibraltar corporation tax as well as levies in the UK and argued that changes to the UK duty structure could have an immediate effect on Gibraltar’s revenues because of the way the tax is applied.

“The minister will be acutely aware that the gaming and gambling sector in Gibraltar is a huge part of their economy,” he said, addressing Labour MP Dan Tomlinson, the Exchequer Secretary at the Treasury.

“So…anything that we do in this place that has an impact on the sector in Gibraltar will leave a huge hole in the Gibraltar economy which will have to be filled.”

Mr Snell also linked the issue to Gibraltar’s wider importance to the UK, saying tax decisions taken in Westminster could affect its ability to fund public services.

He said Gibraltar needed stability and called on the minister to set out what contact the Treasury had had with Gibraltar on the issue.

“Gibraltar is of strategic importance to us,” he said.

“It is part of the family of nations that make up who we are.”

“And decisions that we take in this Finance Bill are having a huge impact on their economy and on their ability to fund their public services and fund their defence.”

Alongside his comments on Gibraltar, Mr Snell devoted substantial attention to what he said were the risks of pushing consumers towards unregulated operators.

He tabled a separate amendment calling for an independent assessment of the impact of the duty changes on the black market, arguing that any effective response to gambling harm depended on keeping consumers inside the regulated sector.

He said the black market offered none of the protections available through licensed operators and warned that those using unregulated sites would be more exposed to harm.

“The more people we push into the black market, where there is no support, there is no gam care, there is no lockout system,” Mr Snell said.

“It means people are more at risk of harmful activity and being preyed upon by predatory organisations.”

“And companies that are outside of the UK do not pay taxes here and are simply not worried about the participants.”

He cited an independent study by Ernst and Young for the Betting and Gaming Council, which he said estimated that £6 billion worth of stakes could be diverted to the black market as a result of the changes.

He told the Commons this would amount to a 140% increase in stakes moving into unregulated channels.

“Now, the independent study done by Ernst and Young for the Betting and Gaming Council did come up that there is a potential for £6 billion worth of stakes to be diverted to black market as a result of this change,” Mr Snell said.

“That’s six billion pounds of stakes that were going to be made somewhere but will go into the black market.”

Mr Snell also said illicit operators were easily accessible and that money staked through those sites could be linked to criminal activity overseas.

“Every single one of us is no more than two clicks away from an unregulated gaming or gambling site, where, again, that money often goes into questionable activities overseas,” he said.

“Some of it is funding organised crime.”

Mr Snell said the Treasury had earmarked £26 million for the UK Gambling Commission as part of broader regulatory changes, but argued that the UK Government had not yet assessed whether that would be sufficient to address the scale of any shift to the black market.

He also said the Treasury had not given him an answer on when a post-implementation review might take place.

“To be honest, we just simply don’t know how big the impact is going to be,” he said.

“The assessment simply hasn’t been done by government to determine whether that £26 million is enough.”

In the debate, Mr Snell said his concern was not to revisit the principle of the tax changes themselves, but to secure an assessment of their unintended consequences for both Gibraltar and the black market.

Alex Ballinger, another Labour MP, took a different stance on the issues raised by Mr Snell, saying any impact on Gibraltar should be weighed against how operators fared in other jurisdictions with higher taxes than the UK.

“I think if the tax changes are going to be as economically damaging as claimed for Gibraltar, we do need to consider how it works in other jurisdictions, because there are often the same gambling organisations operating in other countries with much higher tax rates than the UK and they manage to survive profitably in those sectors,” he said.

“So I think we should take that into consideration when we’re looking at the impact on Gibraltar as well.”

As for concerns about pushing people to black market sites, he said the threat was “overblown” and other sectors such as the tobacco industry had employed a similar narrative in the past that later proved unfounded.

“And again, when we introduced the [gaming sector] point of consumption tax in 2014, again, there was no surge in unregulated or the black market gambling at that point either,” he added.

A study by the UK Gambling Commission in 2021 found only “a very small proportion” of UK gamblers ever used unlicensed sites, “and these were mostly by accident”.

Mr Ballinger welcomed investment to tackle harmful gambling.

“But I think we should not buy into the narrative that risks from the black market should stop us making changes that keep people safe from the most harmful forms of gambling,” he said.

Responding, Mr Tomlinson said he had met twice with Mr Feetham to discuss the impact of the changes on Gibraltar’s economy.

“I do understand there are significant impacts on the economy in Gibraltar and that is something that I hope to keep engaging on and discussing,” he said.

Mr Tomlinson was pressed by Mr Snell who asked whether he would give an assurance that there would be “no future surprises and no significant tax changes” that could impact Gibraltar negatively.

Mr Tomlinson declined “to write future budgets”, adding: “We have made a significant change when it comes to gambling taxation and rather than make further changes the Government will of course monitor to see the impact of that change.”

The Bill passed its third reading and the amendment on Gibraltar was not adopted.

The post Labour MP Raises Questions Over Impact of UK Gambling Tax Hike on Gibraltar Economy appeared first on Eastern European Gaming | Global iGaming & Tech Intelligence Hub.