Latest News
Notice of Kambi Group Plc Extraordinary General Meeting 2022
In terms of Articles 41 and 42 of the Articles of Association of the Company
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that that AN EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING (the “Meeting”) of Kambi Group plc, company number C 49768 (the “Company”) will be held on Thursday 30 June 2022 at 11.00 CEST at Kambi, Hälsingegatan 38, 113 43 Stockholm, Sweden, to consider the following Agenda. The registration of shareholders starts at 10.30 CEST.
Right to attendance and voting
- To be entitled to attend and vote at the Meeting (and for the purpose of the determination by the Company of the number of votes they may cast), shareholders must be entered on the Company’s register of members maintained by Euroclear Sweden AB by Thursday 9 June 2022.
- Shareholders whose shares are registered in the name of a nominee should note that they may be required by their respective nominee/s to temporarily re-register their shares in their own name in the register of members maintained by Euroclear Sweden AB in order to be entitled to attend and vote (in person or by proxy) at the Meeting. Any such re-registration would need to be effected by Thursday 9 June 2022. Shareholders should therefore liaise with and instruct their nominees well in advance thereof.
- To be entitled to attend and vote in person at the Meeting, shareholders must notify Euroclear Sweden AB of their intention to attend the Meeting by Thursday 9 June 2022 and can do so by (i) e-mail to Generalmeetingservice@euroclear. com or (ii) mail to: Kambi Group plc, c/o Euroclear Sweden AB, Box 191, SE-101 23 Stockholm, Sweden or (iii) by phone on +46 8 402 9092 during the office hours of Euroclear Sweden AB. Notification should include the shareholder’s name, address, email address, daytime telephone number, personal or corporate identification number, number of shares held in the Company, as well as details of any proxies (if applicable, in the case that the shareholder has appointed a third party representative to attend the Meeting in their stead). Information submitted in connection with the notification will be computerised and used exclusively for the Meeting. See below for additional information on the processing of personal data.
Shareholders’ right to appoint a proxy
- A shareholder who is entitled to attend and vote at the Meeting, is entitled to appoint one or more proxies to attend and vote on his or her behalf. A proxy need not also be a shareholder. If the shareholder is an individual, the proxy form must be signed by the appointer (or his authorised attorney) or comply with Article 126 of the Articles. If the shareholder is a corporation, the proxy form must be signed on its behalf by an authorised attorney or a duly authorised officer of the corporation or comply with Article 126 of the Articles.
- Proxy forms must clearly indicate whether the proxy is to vote in their discretion or in accordance with the voting instructions sheet attached to the proxy form. Your proxy shall vote as you have directed in respect of the resolutions set out in this notice or on any other resolution that is properly put to the meeting. If the proxy form is returned to the Company without any indication as to how the proxy shall vote, generally or in respect of a particular resolution, the proxy shall exercise their discretion as to how to vote or whether to abstain from voting, generally or in respect of that particular resolution (as applicable).
- Where the shareholder is a corporation, a document evidencing the signatory right of the officer signing the proxy form, must be submitted with the proxy form. Where the proxy form is signed on behalf of the shareholder by an attorney (rather than by an authorised representative, in the case of a corporation), the original power of attorney or a copy thereof certified or notarised in a manner acceptable to the Board of Directors must be submitted to the Company, failing which the appointment of the proxy may be treated as invalid.
- The original signed proxy form and, if applicable, other supporting documents (required pursuant to the above instructions), must be received by Euroclear Sweden AB no later than Thursday 9 June 2022 by (i) e-mail to Generalmeetingservice@euroclear .com or (ii) mail to: Kambi Group plc, c/o Euroclear Sweden AB, Box 191, SE-101 23 Stockholm, Sweden. Shareholders are therefore encouraged to submit their proxy forms (and other supporting documents, if any) as soon as possible.
- Proxy forms are available on the Company website under the General Meetings section.
- Aggregated attendance notifications and proxy data processed by Euroclear Sweden AB must be transmitted to and received by the Company by email at Mia.Nordlander@kambi .com not less than 48 hours before the time appointed for the Meeting and in default shall not be treated as valid.
Agenda
1. Opening of the Meeting
2. Election of Chairman of the Meeting
3. Drawing up and approval of the voting list
4. Approval of the Agenda
5. Determination that the Meeting has been duly convened
6. Election of two persons to approve the minutes
Special Business (Extraordinary Resolutions)
7. THAT the Directors be and are hereby duly authorised and empowered in accordance with Articles 85(1) and 88(7) of the Companies Act and Article 3 of the Articles, on one or several occasions prior to the date of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company, to issue and allot up to a maximum of 3,106,480 Ordinary ‘B’ shares in the Company of a nominal value of €0.003 each (corresponding to a dilution of 10% of total shares as at the date of the notice to the 2022 Annual General Meeting) for payment in kind or through a direct set-off in connection with an acquisition, and to authorise and empower the Directors to restrict or withdraw the right of pre-emption associated to the issue of the said shares. This resolution is being taken in terms and for the purposes of the approvals necessary in terms of the Companies Act and the Articles of Association of the Company. (Resolution a)
8. WHEREAS (i) at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company held on 30 March 2022, the Directors resolved to obtain authority to buy back Ordinary ‘B’ shares in the Company having a nominal value of €0.003 each; and
(ii) pursuant to Article 5 of the Articles and Article 106(1) (b) of the Companies Act a company may acquire any of its own shares otherwise than by subscription, provided inter alia authorisation is given by an extraordinary resolution, which resolution will need to determine the terms and conditions of such acquisitions and in particular the maximum number of shares to be acquired, the duration of the period for which the authorisation is given and the maximum and minimum consideration.
NOW THEREFORE the members of the Company resolve that the Company be generally authorised to make purchases of Ordinary ‘B’ shares in the Company of a nominal value of €0.003 each in its capital, subject to the following:
(a) the maximum number of shares that may be so acquired is 3,106,480 which is equivalent to 10% of total shares as at the date of the notice to the 2022 Annual General Meeting;
(b) the minimum price that may be paid for the shares is SEK1 per share;
(c) the maximum price that may be paid for the shares is SEK1,000 per share;
(d) the maximum aggregate number of shares that can either be i) issued and allotted under Resolution a and, ii) bought back under this Resolution b, shall not exceed 3,106,480; and
(e) the authority conferred by this resolution shall expire on the date of the 2023 Annual General Meeting, but in any case shall not exceed the period of 18 months, but not so as to prejudice the completion of a purchase contracted before that date. (Resolution b)
9. Closing of the Extraordinary General Meeting
Information about proposals related to Agenda items
Both extraordinary Resolutions, Resolutions a and b, were presented in their entirety to the Annual General Meeting held on 17 May, 2022 (which resolutions were referred to therein as resolutions m and n respectively), and obtained one majority of two required in terms of article 135 of the Companies Act (Cap 386), and in terms of Articles 48B.2(b) of the Articles of Association of the Company. To this end, this Extraordinary General Meeting is being convened within 30 days of the Annual General Meeting, in accordance with the aforementioned provisions of the Companies Act and the Articles, in order to take a fresh vote on the proposed extraordinary resolutions.
Agenda item 7 (Resolution a)
The objectives of the authorisation are to increase the financial flexibility of the Company and to enable the Company to use its own financial instruments for payment in kind or through a directed set-off to a selling partner in connection with any business acquisitions the Company may undertake or to settle any deferred payments in connection with business acquisitions. The market value of the shares on each issue date will be used in determining the price at which shares will be issued. For the purposes of Article 88(7) of the Companies Act, through this resolution the members of the Company are also authorising the Board of Directors to restrict or withdraw the members’ right of pre-emption that would normally entitle members to be offered the newly issued shares in the Company in proportion to their shareholding before such new shares are offered to third parties.
Agenda item 8 (Resolution b)
The Board of Directors proposes that the acquisition by the Company of its own shares shall take place on First North Growth Market at Nasdaq Stockholm or via an offer to acquire the shares to all members of the Company. Such acquisitions of own shares may take place on multiple occasions and will be based on market terms, prevailing regulations and the capital situation at any given time. Notification of any purchase will be made to First North Growth Market at Nasdaq Stockholm and details will appear in the Company’s annual report and accounts. Any resolution to repurchase own shares will be publicly disclosed. The objective of the buyback and transfer right is to ensure added value for the Company’s shareholders and to give the Board increased flexibility with the Company’s capital structure.
Following such buybacks, the intention of the Board would be to either cancel, use as consideration for an acquisition or transfer to employees under a company share incentive plan. Once repurchased, further shareholder and Bondholder approval would be required before those shares could be cancelled.
If used as consideration for an acquisition the intention would be that they would be issued as shares and not sold first.
Powered by WPeMatico
Casino Guru
Casino Guru Awards 2026 set for May 25 in Malta as final evaluations begin
Casino Guru has started its final evaluation phase for the Casino Guru Awards 2026, with winners set to be announced on May 25 at Xara Lodge in Malta, ahead of the NEXT Valletta conference.
The company said nominations have closed and shortlists are finalized, with the Casino Guru team now reviewing shortlisted nominees’ track records through judge discussions and meetings with candidates. Winners are selected using what Casino Guru describes as a mix of data-led evaluation and expert assessment, drawing on its Safety Index and Complaint Resolution Center.
Public voting remains open for the Player’s Choice and Voice of the People categories, giving players and industry stakeholders a direct vote alongside the judging process.
“The Casino Guru Awards are not about who is the biggest or most visible,” said Daniela Sliva, PR & Creative Projects Director from Casino Guru. “They are about who is doing the right thing, even when no one is watching.”
Casino Guru expects around 150 guests at the Malta event, which it positioned as an industry networking evening alongside the awards announcements.
The post Casino Guru Awards 2026 set for May 25 in Malta as final evaluations begin appeared first on Eastern European Gaming | Global iGaming & Tech Intelligence Hub.
football partnerships
Mega Riches funds West Brom charity hospitality packages at The Hawthorns
Immense Group’s online casino brand Mega Riches has provided a series of matchday hospitality packages at The Hawthorns for supporters connected to The Albion Foundation, the official charity partner of West Bromwich Albion.
The initiative ran across multiple fixtures this season, with beneficiaries hosted in the Richardson Suite. The club’s back-of-shirt sponsor said the packages went to Foundation volunteers, charity fundraisers and community lottery winners.
The press release highlights recipients including a long-serving Foundation volunteer celebrating her 70th birthday, and a supporter whose attendance at Foundation Day helped raise £1,127 for the Cancer Kickers programme. Winners from the Foundation’s Baggies Bonanza and darts evening fundraisers were also included.
One winner, Albion fan Ellie, attended the Albion vs Millwall match as Mega Riches’ guest after winning a bonus prize at the Hull City Foundation Day fixture in March. She said: “Our time in The Richardson Suite was fab. The staff and service were impeccable.
“We thoroughly enjoyed the food and complimentary drinks, as well as the Q&A session with the WBA legends. I would really recommend anyone wanting a more VIP experience at Albion to give it a try.”
Immense Group CMO Marco Trucco said: “Football reaches into communities in a way very few things do. When we looked at how we wanted to build our relationship with West Bromwich Albion, brand visibility was never going to be enough on its own.
“The work the Albion Foundation does, for cancer patients, for volunteers, for people who might otherwise be isolated, that’s the kind of purpose we want our brands to support. Mega Riches made that happen this season. Immense Group intends to keep making it happen.”
The post Mega Riches funds West Brom charity hospitality packages at The Hawthorns appeared first on Eastern European Gaming | Global iGaming & Tech Intelligence Hub.
Betsson
What the Betsson/Inter Milan case reveals about cross-border gambling branding when two restrictive regimes collide
By David Nilsen, Editor-in-Chief, Kongebonus
European football rarely stays confined within national borders. Teams compete internationally, brands operate globally and sponsorship deals are designed for audiences far beyond a single market. Yet gambling regulation remains firmly national. When these two realities meet, tensions are almost inevitable.
That tension was visible during the UEFA Champions League fixture between Inter Milan and Bodø/Glimt at the Aspmyra Stadion in February, when the Italian club took to the pitch wearing Betsson.sport on its shirts. The Norwegian Gambling Authority later confirmed it had opened a case following the match, after concerns were raised that the branding could violate Norway’s strict marketing rules.
At first glance, the situation appears straightforward. Norway prohibits gambling marketing from any operator other than the state-owned Norsk Tipping and Norsk Rikstoto. Under this framework, foreign operators are not allowed to advertise or actively target Norwegian players. However, the details of this particular case are more complex.
The logo that appeared on Inter’s shirt was not a betting website, but Betsson.sport, a sports-focused platform linked to the company’s sponsorship activity in Italy. The site itself does not offer deposits or betting functionality. Instead, it operates as a sports content and partnership platform connected to the club’s commercial agreements.
This distinction matters because the regulatory context in Italy is very different from Norway’s. In 2018, Italy introduced the Decreto Dignità, one of Europe’s strictest gambling advertising bans. The legislation effectively eliminated traditional betting sponsorships across media and sport, even for licensed operators.
As a result, many brands have had to rethink how they maintain visibility in sports environments. Alternative branding, content platforms and sports-focused domains have become one of the few remaining routes available in a market where direct betting advertising is largely prohibited.
Seen through that lens, Betsson.sport is less an attempt to bypass regulation and more an example of how companies adapt to it.
When Inter Milan travelled to northern Norway, however, that Italian solution entered a completely different regulatory environment. Norway’s restrictions are not based on a broad ban on gambling advertising. Instead, they are built around the protection of a state monopoly. Only two operators are permitted to market gambling services domestically, and enforcement tools such as payment blocking and website restrictions are used to limit access to foreign operators.
The key question raised by the Inter match therefore becomes one of interpretation rather than simple legality. Does the presence of a brand associated with gambling, even when it links to a non-betting platform, constitute marketing towards Norwegian consumers?
It is a question regulators across Europe are likely to face more often as global sport continues to expand and sponsorship models become more complex.
Another factor worth noting is accessibility. Betsson does not currently operate in Norway, and access to its gambling platforms has been blocked for Norwegian users. This raises the issue of whether brand visibility alone, without a functional gambling product available to local players, should be considered the same as active marketing.
From a regulatory perspective, authorities may still decide that the brand association itself falls under advertising restrictions. That interpretation would be consistent with Norway’s broader efforts to protect the monopoly model and prevent indirect promotion of unlicensed operators.
At the same time, cases like this highlight the practical challenges regulators face when global sports competitions cross with national advertising rules. European tournaments bring together teams, sponsors and audiences from multiple jurisdictions, each operating under different regulatory philosophies.
Italy, for example, has taken a sweeping approach by banning gambling advertising across the board. Norway, meanwhile, has focused on maintaining exclusive rights for state operators while limiting the presence of international competitors.
Both systems are strict in their own way, but they are built on different principles.
When a club like Inter Milan competes internationally, the sponsorship arrangements negotiated within one regulatory system inevitably travel into another. This creates situations where branding designed to comply with one set of rules may still raise questions under another.
For players and fans, these nuances are rarely visible. What they see is simply a football shirt and a brand name. But for regulators, operators and industry observers, the case illustrates how complex the global gambling landscape has become.
None of this changes the underlying reality that gambling advertising remains one of the most tightly controlled areas of the digital economy. Governments are increasingly focused on consumer protection, and enforcement tools are becoming more sophisticated each year.
But as the Inter–Betsson example demonstrates, the real challenge lies not only in writing regulations but in applying them consistently in a world where sport, media and digital platforms operate across borders.
For the industry, it is another reminder that regulatory debates are rarely black and white. In many cases, they sit somewhere in between legal interpretation, practical enforcement and the global nature of modern sport.
The case opened by the Norwegian Gambling Authority and its conclusions may help clarify how situations like this should be interpreted going forward.
But as long as football continues to be played across borders, questions like these are unlikely to disappear any time soon.
The post What the Betsson/Inter Milan case reveals about cross-border gambling branding when two restrictive regimes collide appeared first on Eastern European Gaming | Global iGaming & Tech Intelligence Hub.
-
Balkans6 days agoPasha Hotel & Casino Group and Platinum Casino Launch Pasha Platinum Casino at Grand Hotel Plovdiv in Bulgaria
-
Adjarabet6 days agoGalaxsys Enters into Strategic Partnership with Adjarabet
-
AGCO6 days agoEndorphina secures AGCO supplier registration in Ontario
-
Aviator LLC5 days agoAviator Studio Brazil wins two consecutive instances in São Paulo appeal court against SPRIBE injunction
-
Altenar7 days agoOfensiva legislativa y el riesgo de una “Ley Seca” de las apuestas en Brasil
-
BetMGM7 days agoBetMGM lands first-to-market exclusivity for new AGS Rakin’ Bacon! slots
-
Altenar7 days agoLegislative offensive and the risk of a “Prohibition era” for betting in Brazil
-
Bichara e Motta Advogados6 days agoLos nuevos desafíos de la industria del iGaming en 2026



