Connect with us

bets

Sports Betting, E-cigarettes and the Illusion of Prohibition

Published

on

sports-betting,-e-cigarettes-and-the-illusion-of-prohibition

The debate over banning online betting in Brazil is resurfacing at a sensitive moment in the public discourse, marked by simplistic solutions to complex issues.

In this article, Thiago Iusim, founder and CEO of Betshield Responsible Gaming, analyzes the parallels between the electronic cigarette market and the ‘Bets’ sector, highlighting how attempts to eliminate an activity by decree tend to push it into informality.

According to him, the Brazilian experience shows that prohibition does not eliminate markets — it merely reduces the State’s ability to control them and increases risks for consumers.

Brazil has seen this movie before.

There is a magic solution that always seems to return to public debate, especially in election season, whenever an issue becomes politically inconvenient: ban it.

The logic is seductive. In the political narrative, the issue disappears. In real life, it simply moves elsewhere.

E-cigarettes make that point painfully clear.

Vapes have never been authorized in Brazil. They have been officially banned since 2009. In theory, they should not exist. In practice, they are everywhere, sold through social media, messaging apps, marketplaces, street vendors, and small retail shops, with no sanitary controls, no effective oversight, and no real guarantee of origin.

Prohibition did not eliminate the market.

It only eliminated the possibility of surrounding that market with rules.

A recent CNN report on the surge in e-cigarette seizures helps show the scale of the problem. Brazil did not get rid of vapes. It simply pushed the market into an environment where the state lost the capacity to control it.

The state banned it. Organized crime applauded.

That experience helps explain the current debate around online betting in Brazil.

Bets existed long before Law 14,790/2023. For years, Brazil lived with an active market operating online and from abroad, with no local tax collection, no regulatory oversight, and no effective consumer protection tools.

The activity did not emerge because of the law. The law emerged because the activity already existed.

Regulation was the rational response. It was the way to bring an already existing market into a controllable framework, with licenses, concession fees, user identification, anti-money laundering requirements, advertising rules, and player protection mechanisms.

And yet, just eighteen months later, public debate is once again flirting with the same simplistic solution applied to vapes: the fantasy that prohibition would make the activity disappear.

By now, Brazil should know better.

In the case of betting, the country had chosen a different path: regulate in order to control. Protect consumers. Protect the broader economy.

To now return to prohibition as a response to a market that already exists would be more than a regulatory mistake.

It would be a historical contradiction.

Or perhaps simply the most comfortable expression of a certain kind of public moralism that would rather push an activity into the shadows than acknowledge its existence.

In political discourse, prohibition can sound like victory.

In practice, it often functions as morally comfortable packaging for rushed and politically convenient decisions.

This is nothing more than electoral fantasy. And this time, no one will be able to say they did not know how the story would end.

 

Thiago Iusim
Founder and CEO of Betshield Responsible Gaming

The post Sports Betting, E-cigarettes and the Illusion of Prohibition appeared first on Americas iGaming & Sports Betting News.

bets

Stellar Gaming e the best World Cup of all time

Published

on

stellar-gaming-e-the-best-world-cup-of-all-time

The World Cup 2026 promises to be a turning point for the Brazilian sports betting market, the first major stress test in a fully regulated environment, with projections reaching R$ 19 billion in turnover in the country.

In this scenario, Stellar Gaming (EstrelaBet) positions itself at the center of this transformation, where technology, legal security, and user experience become strategic pillars of growth.

In an exclusive interview, Fellipe Fraga, CBO of Stellar Gaming, analyzes how the maturity of the regulated market, the advancement of responsible gaming, the evolution of technological infrastructure, and the fight against the illegal market will shape the “best World Cup of all time” for digital entertainment in Brazil, and the legacy this event will leave for the industry.

The World Cup 2026 is the first major ‘stress test’ of the fully regulated Brazilian market, with projections of around R$ 19 billion in turnover in the country. How does Stellar Gaming assess that legal certainty and operational maturity will make this tournament the ‘best World Cup of recent times’ for digital entertainment in Brazil?

Fellipe Fraga – In the 2022 World Cup, we were still fighting for market regulation, which unfortunately did not happen in time.

This time, we will have the opportunity to test not only at the technology level, but also in terms of customer behavior, as we will see the impact of the biggest sporting event in the world.

In addition, in regulated operations, the control tools provided for in the specific regulations ensure a safe experience for the customer and enhance the reach of responsible gaming.

With this, the next two months represent great expectations for the sector.

In a mass event that attracts millions of new bettors, concerns about problem gambling come into focus. EstrelaBet has a pioneering partnership with FUMEC. How does the AI-based predictive risk matrix work in practice to identify atypical patterns and ensure that the World Cup is a safe leisure moment, distancing the brand from the stigma of the ‘gray’ market of the past?

One of the great advantages of technological advancement is being able to use it to improve the collective experience, and it is no different when we talk about responsible gaming.

By introducing machine learning mechanisms with data and behavioral science concepts, we can improve risk predictability in behaviors where the customer shows signs of moving away from responsible gaming.

This allows the operation to act to reduce these risks, ensuring that betting entertainment is only what it is meant to be: fun.

We know that Brazilian users are mobile-first and do not tolerate friction during an important match. EstrelaBet has recently improved loading time by 60% and reduced live betting latency by 80%. How does this “Formula 1” infrastructure, led by the technology team, translate into trust and user retention during tournament peak moments?

The main direction we must take is to put ourselves in the customer’s shoes and understand what can create friction in the experience. A site that is unstable and slow is not well received.

That is why we adopted a mindset we called “EstrelaTech”, focused on technological development to improve the customer experience.

This automatically generates confidence in performance, stability, and service quality, which, combined with our technology partners, enables the delivery of a platform where entertainment happens more smoothly.

The brand’s CEO, João Gerçossimo, recently brought from SXSW the concept of the “Attention Economy 3.0”, where community belonging surpasses aggressive offers. How does EstrelaBet plan to apply this philosophy during the World Cup to retain customers without relying solely on transactional acquisition bonuses?

The World Cup is an excellent opportunity to bring the customer closer to the brand.

On June 5th, we will launch a major campaign that connects the audience and the brand to the national desire to achieve the sixth world title.

This connection goes beyond the product itself and is about the relationship between the customer and the company.

Our marketing team’s work has been outstanding, including in the choice of media partners, who are able to communicate with the audience and deliver key messages, not only about entertainment but also about a modern mindset regarding health, physical activity, and technology.

Sports integrity is a cornerstone of a strong regulated market. Today, EstrelaBet uses AI systems that achieve up to 90% accuracy in detecting suspicious behavior, such as multi-account abuse. How will this technology be used to protect the platform against fraudsters during the high volatility of the World Cup?

The betting product is essentially about uncertainty about the future, whether in an online game or a sporting event.

Any situation that tries to guarantee a future outcome empties the essence of the product.

Therefore, defending sports integrity is extremely important to us in itself, and combined with our passion for sport as an entertainment platform, it makes us even more committed to protecting it.

With technology and partnerships, we are able to monitor suspicious behavior and track fraud attempts in real time.

Although the World Cup carries the weight of being the biggest sporting event, with all eyes on it and consequently reducing the risk of suspicious behavior on the field, it is essential to ensure that there is also no negative influence on operations, allowing not only AI but also dialogue with partners to work in the best possible way.

With the World Cup taking place in the Americas (USA, Mexico, and Canada), the time zone is extremely favorable for Brazilian bettors. Combined with the advancement of 5G, what is EstrelaBet’s expectatio for the explosion of in-play betting and micro-moments during Brazil’s matches?

The Brazilian market already predominantly uses mobile phones. Matches taking place, often outside working hours, will allow the act of sitting down and watching a game to be enhanced.

Therefore, the trend is for a significant increase in activity during the World Cup, where the social factor—being with friends, watching the game together, and betting—will play an important role.

You, Fellipe Fraga, as the brand’s CBO, have been vocal about the fact that overly restricting licensed platforms only pushes users toward the illegal market. During an event with the scale of the World Cup, how can the regulated sector and the government work together to educate the public and prevent revenue leakage to unlicensed operators

The World Cup is a huge opportunity for the public sector in a broad sense, not only the regulator, but also the Federal Government and even legislators, to join forces in favor of the regulated sector.

Only through proper operations is it possible to have data, access to behavioral insights, and proper tax collection that will enable the country’s development, along with the correct promotion of responsible gaming initiatives.

We hope this awareness helps to combat an illegal market that, if not addressed, will only benefit illicit activities.

For the market, the 2026 World Cup is considered the “extended Super Bowl.” After the final whistle on July 19, what will be the main legacy of this US$ 35 billion tournament for the Brazilian sports betting market, considering the advances achieved in governance, technology, and end-user protection?

The 2026 World Cup will allow a full understanding of customer behavior in the betting market.
We will have data, results, and information collected from the various initiatives and strategies the market adopts.

The increase in volume will allow the validation of responsible gaming and sports integrity theses, as well as ensuring that users treat betting as proper entertainment during leisure moments while watching matches.

The post Stellar Gaming e the best World Cup of all time appeared first on Americas iGaming & Sports Betting News.

Continue Reading

ANJL

Betting in Brazil under credit restrictions and regulatory debates

Published

on

betting-in-brazil-under-credit-restrictions-and-regulatory-debates

The regulatory landscape of iGaming and electronic betting in Brazil is undergoing a profound realignment that combines high-level political tension, structural mental health metrics, and new financial payment barriers.

Bellow, the core pillars transforming the operational and compliance dynamics of the industry nationwide.

“If it were up to me, I would ban them all”

The online betting ecosystem has established itself as a central agenda item for the federal Executive branch.

President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva ratified his intention to tighten controls over the marketing campaigns of digital platforms.

Speaking during an interview on EBC’s Sem Censura program, the president was direct in confirming his regulatory plans for advertisements, even revealing a drastic personal stance:

“If it were up to me, I would ban them all.”

However, the head of state recognized the institutional boundaries that limit his administration’s leverage over regulated economic activities, noting that the country’s governance depends on a tripartite system.

“I am not the owner of Brazil. I am part of a system of institutions that govern the country alongside the National Congress and the Judiciary,” he pointed out.

Legislative barriers and the electoral agenda

To illustrate the political complexity of industry oversight, Lula exposed the balance of power within the legislature, noting that his political base holds just 70 deputies out of 513 and 9 senators out of 81.

This correlation means that any unilateral veto by the Executive could easily be overturned by the Legislative branch, where the betting sector maintains significant political influence.

Despite these legislative hurdles, the government highlighted the progress made by the specialized secretariat within the Ministry of Finance, which has successfully deactivated over 90% of illegal gambling domains in the country, and confirmed that the moratorium on granting new operating licenses will extend until the end of the year.

The Executive signaled that market regulation will form an active part of upcoming political campaigns.

The focus will remain on linking digital betting to public health, considering that 1.3 million young citizens, mostly low-income, interact with these platforms, affecting family budgets and justifying containment measures such as the 12-month betting account freeze for individuals seeking to renegotiate their debts.

The New Desenrola initiative and the financial offensive against debt

As part of its macroeconomic strategy to curb household over-indebtedness, the Brazilian government launched the New Desenrola program.

The initiative aims to cut off indirect financing channels in gambling through Article 16, which strictly prohibits any credit operations that serve as a bridge to transfer resources to betting platforms.

The primary objective of the rule is to shut down the use of credit-linked Pix (Pix crédito) as a deposit method.

A technical audit conducted by Folha de S.Paulo revealed that despite the implementation of the rule, major tier-one entities such as Bradesco and Banco do Brasil kept the credit transfer feature available for betting deposits until mid-May.

This government concern is backed by CNC economic indicators, which place Brazil’s family debt index at a critical 80.4%, the highest proportion recorded since the historical data series began in 2010.

The mechanics of credit-linked Pix and the banking response

From the legal perspective of the financial system, credit-linked Pix qualifies technically as a post-paid payment method, given that the user finalizes the cash payment after the transaction rather than upfront.

Lacking specific standalone regulation from the Central Bank (BC), this tool operates under two internal commercial modalities handled by banks:

  • Card-backed financing: The financial institution processes the charge on the customer’s credit card limit, deducts operational service fees, and sends an immediate cash transfer via Pix to the recipient. If the user fails to clear their monthly statement, they enter the revolving credit interest pool.
  • Direct personal loans: The bank approves an interest-bearing personal loan for the consumer, instantly routing the credit capital generated from the operation to the destination commercial establishment.

Faced with this scenario, most commercial banks chose to block these movements once internal compliance systems flag that the destination corporate ID (CNPJ) belongs to the list of 85 licensed operators published by the Ministry of Finance. Instead, they enforce corporate Pix QR codes restricted to cash transactions and emit risk alerts through platforms like Nubank and PicPay.

Regulatory oversight vacuums and operator reactions

Although the regulatory framework mandates fines of up to R$ 2 billion and license suspensions for betting houses that accept post-paid payment methods, operators represented by the IBJR and the ANJL clarified that they possess no technical means to filter out credit-linked Pix.

Because the financing is cleared entirely within the internal banking environment, the funds reach betting accounts as a standard instant bank transfer, shifting the responsibility of transaction filtering back to the financial institutions.

For its part, the monetary authority has yet to define the definitive inspection framework. The Secretariat of Prizes and Betting (SPA) of the Ministry of Finance holds the power to penalize gambling platforms but lacks the legal jurisdiction to discipline commercial banks.

Legal experts point to a regulatory vacuum that requires a new ordinance to empower the SPA to audit not only betting operators, but also their intermediary payment providers.

Constitutional litigation and the defense of the regulated industry

Regulatory friction has also shifted to the judicial and federal arenas.

The National Association of Games and Lotteries (ANJL) filed a Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI 7971) before the Supreme Federal Court (STF) against Law 16.508/2026 enacted by the state of Rio Grande do Sul.

The provincial statute imposes severe restrictions on the marketing campaigns of iGaming platforms within state lines.

The association representing the regulated market argues that the state government violates Article 22 of the Federal Constitution, which grants the exclusive competence to legislate on telecommunications and commercial advertising solely to the Federal Union.

The case was assigned to Supreme Court Justice Cármen Lúcia, and the industry is seeking an urgent preliminary injunction to prevent a chaotic fragmentation of regional advertising laws from ultimately strengthening unregulated, offshore black-market domains.

Aligning with the sector’s institutional defense, André Gelfi, Director of the Brazilian Responsible Gaming Institute (IBJR), warned about the dangers of turning the regulated betting industry into a “convenient scapegoat” for household default trends.

Gelfi argued that political debates routinely generalize the activity without differentiating authorized environments from clandestine networks.

The director advocated for “Smart Regulation” sustained by behavioral user monitoring, financial education, and technical actions aimed exclusively at the illegal market.

Market indicators: tax collection and self-exclusions

The consolidation of the legal market in the country shows a direct impact on state coffers.

According to the official balance sheet of the Federal Revenue Office (Receita Federal), obtained via the Access to Information Law, the federal government collected R$ 4.17 billion from gaming and lotteries during the first quarter of 2026.

Within this fiscal pool, licensed online fixed-odds betting platforms generated R$ 1.15 billion, consolidating sports betting as a stable source of federal revenue for the National Treasury.

In parallel with economic growth, responsible gaming mechanisms are recording unprecedented activity. In its first five months of operation, the central platform of the Ministry of Finance processed 519,000 player requests for self-exclusion from digital betting environments.

The report details that the system absorbs an average of 144 requests per hour, with 40% of cases based on a loss of behavioral control over gambling, demonstrating the active adoption of these compliance tools by consumers to curb addiction.

The post Betting in Brazil under credit restrictions and regulatory debates appeared first on Americas iGaming & Sports Betting News.

Continue Reading

apuestas deportivas

¿Son las casas de apuestas las culpables o la arquitectura económica construida por Brasil en los últimos 35 años?

Published

on

¿son-las-casas-de-apuestas-las-culpables-o-la-arquitectura-economica-construida-por-brasil-en-los-ultimos-35-anos?
¿Son las casas de apuestas las culpables o la arquitectura económica construida por Brasil en los últimos 35 años?

Esta es la pregunta central planteada por Carlos Akira Sato en su análisis sobre el creciente endeudamiento de los hogares en Brasil.

En lugar de atribuir el sobreendeudamiento a las plataformas de apuestas deportivas, sostiene que el problema tiene sus raíces en décadas de transformación económica marcadas por la expansión del crédito, la financiarización y sistemas cada vez más sofisticados de estimulación del consumo en múltiples sectores.

El debate sobre el endeudamiento de las familias brasileñas ha ganado un nuevo objetivo preferente: las plataformas de apuestas deportivas.

Las llamadas “bets” han pasado a ocupar un lugar central en los medios, el discurso político y las discusiones regulatorias, frecuentemente asociadas al aumento de la morosidad y la compulsividad financiera.

Pero quizá la pregunta correcta sea otra: ¿el sobreendeudamiento de las familias brasileñas realmente nació con las bets?

La respuesta, desde un análisis histórico riguroso, es negativa.

El fenómeno es mucho anterior a la regulación de las apuestas deportivas y está vinculado a una profunda transformación económica, cultural y tecnológica iniciada en los años 90, cuando Brasil abandonó gradualmente una economía cerrada e inflacionaria para entrar en una lógica moderna de consumo, crédito y financiarización de la vida cotidiana.

La apertura económica promovida durante el gobierno de Collor cambió el patrón de consumo del país.
Pocos años después, el Plan Real trajo estabilidad monetaria y transformó la propia psicología económica de la población.

Por primera vez, millones de brasileños comenzaron a financiar bienes, usar tarjetas de crédito, pagar en cuotas e incorporar el endeudamiento como parte normal de la vida económica.

Este proceso representó un avance y una inclusión financiera.

Pero también consolidó un nuevo modelo económico basado en la anticipación del ingreso futuro de los hogares. El crédito dejó de ser una excepción y se convirtió en infraestructura permanente de sostén del consumo nacional.

Bancos, minoristas y entidades financieras comprendieron rápidamente este cambio. Grandes cadenas dejaron de actuar únicamente como distribuidoras de productos para convertirse en plataformas financieras.

Las tarjetas private label, los sistemas de financiación sofisticados y los mecanismos permanentes de crédito pasaron a integrar la vida cotidiana del consumidor. En muchos casos, el margen financiero se volvió tan relevante como la propia venta del producto.

A lo largo de los años 2000, el modelo se profundizó.

La expansión de la bancarización, de los medios electrónicos de pago y de las fintech aceleró la financiarización de la vida cotidiana.

A partir de 2013, con la apertura regulatoria impulsada por la Ley nº 12.865, el celular pasó a funcionar simultáneamente como banco, billetera digital, plataforma de crédito, marketplace y entorno permanente de monetización del comportamiento.

El crédito se volvió instantáneo, invisible e integrado a la experiencia digital.

El consumidor pasó a contratar financiación en pocos clics, muchas veces dentro del propio flujo de compra. Brasil entró definitivamente en la era de la hiperestimulación conductual del consumo.

Y aquí es donde el debate contemporáneo comienza a revelar una contradicción importante.

Mientras el país construyó durante décadas una sofisticada arquitectura económica basada en expansión del crédito, publicidad emocional, gamificación, captura de la atención y monetización del ingreso futuro, la inversión estructural en educación financiera siguió siendo insuficiente.

Brasil enseñó a su población a consumir antes de enseñarle a construir patrimonio.

Hoy, prácticamente todos los sectores relevantes de la economía operan mecanismos avanzados de estímulo conductual: retail digital, aplicaciones, streaming, delivery, marketplaces, bancos, fintechs y redes sociales.

La publicidad dejó de ser meramente informativa y pasó a ser algorítmica, personalizada y emocional.

El consumidor moderno compite por su atención y autocontrol contra sistemas diseñados para maximizar el engagement y el consumo continuo.

Este fenómeno aparece incluso en sectores raramente asociados al debate regulatorio.

El comercio alimentario, por ejemplo, utiliza técnicas sofisticadas de neuromarketing para impulsar el consumo de productos ultraprocesados, bebidas alcohólicas e ítems de compra impulsiva. Sin embargo, pocos segmentos han enfrentado un nivel de monitoreo similar al impuesto a las apuestas deportivas.

El sector regulado de las bets surgió en Brasil bajo uno de los marcos más estrictos de la economía digital.

Las plataformas deben identificar usuarios biométricamente, monitorear el comportamiento, rastrear operaciones, comunicar movimientos sospechosos al COAF, implementar políticas de juego responsable e impedir apuestas financiadas con crédito.

Es decir: el regulador entendió correctamente que la combinación entre compulsividad y crédito podía ser socialmente explosiva.

Pero aquí surge una pregunta inevitable: ¿por qué sectores históricamente asociados al sobreendeudamiento de las familias brasileñas operaron durante décadas bajo niveles significativamente menores de monitoreo conductual?

Datos de la CNC muestran que el porcentaje de familias endeudadas alcanzó el 80,2% en febrero de 2026 — el nivel más alto de la serie histórica.

Este escenario no nació con las bets. Es el resultado de décadas de expansión agresiva del crédito, financiarización de la vida cotidiana, hiperestimulación del consumo y ausencia estructural de educación económica de la población.

Marco comparativo : obligaciones regulatorias y conductuales

Tema / Obligación Bets Bancos Retail / Alimentos
Identificación formal del cliente (KYC) Obligatoria, robusta, con biometría Obligatoria Limitada
Validación de titularidad de cuenta Obligatoria Generalmente obligatoria Normalmente inexistente
Monitoreo conductual Alto Enfocado en fraude y crédito Bajo
Prohibición del uso de crédito No No
Publicidad emocional Con restricciones crecientes Permitida con límites Ampliamente utilizada
Protección contra compulsividad Obligatoria Muy limitada Prácticamente inexistente
Herramientas de autoexclusión Obligatorias Inexistentes Inexistentes
Obligación de reporte al COAF Limitada
Control del origen de fondos Obligatorio Obligatorio Generalmente inexistente
Fiscalización conductual Intensa Moderada Baja
Políticas de consumo responsable Obligatorias Parciales Generalmente inexistentes

El punto más provocador quizá sea justamente la asimetría regulatoria que este debate revela.

Varios sectores históricamente asociados a la compulsividad, el hiperconsumo y la dependencia han operado durante décadas bajo una lógica regulatoria menos intervencionista que la actualmente aplicada a las apuestas deportivas.

Al final, el verdadero debate tal vez no sea solo “cómo regular las apuestas”, sino cómo preparar a la sociedad para vivir en una economía digital, hiperinanciarizada y permanentemente orientada a la captura de la atención, el consumo y la monetización conductual.

Carlos Akira Sato
Co-Founder de Fenynx Digital Assets y especialista en Mercados Regulados, Infraestructura Financiera, Gobernanza e Innovación. Vicepresidente de Relaciones Institucionales de PAGOS (Asociación de Gestión de Medios de Pagos Electrónicos).

The post ¿Son las casas de apuestas las culpables o la arquitectura económica construida por Brasil en los últimos 35 años? appeared first on Americas iGaming & Sports Betting News.

Continue Reading

Trending