OddsSeeker.com Launches All-New 6-Point Rating System to Review & Score Sweepstakes Casinos

OddsSeeker.com has unveiled a new sweepstakes casino rating system, which will quantifiably rank operators by several key factors.

On February 1, 2024, the company launched a new 6-point rating system, a complete reimagining of sweepstakes casino reviews. It will offer insight into the way these casinos work, providing players with invaluable information so they can easily understand which gaming site is right for them.

This enables a weighting of sweepstakes casinos that have unique offerings such as PayPal cashier options, live dealer games, sports predictions, and so on.

Through easy-to-scan infographics, the score will both subjectively and objectively numerically rank each sweepstakes casino, allowing players to immediately understand the fine print behind bonuses, as well as site offerings.

Advertisement

You can find an example of this latest rating system in OddsSeeker’s Sportzino review, which is a new sweepstakes casino on the market.

With 25 years of experience in the casino gaming industry worldwide and 10 years advocating for players in the US, the OddsSeeker team has a wealth of knowledge of the overall customer experience at gaming sites.

OddsSeeker has conducted research in the social and sweepstakes casino industries since 2016, and for the past four years, the entire focus of OddsSeeker has been to provide reviews and ratings of sweepstakes casinos.

“We want to help people understand the most important differences between sweepstakes casinos so they can understand the benefits and risks of sites where they’ll potentially spend their money. We created this system to help people get more bang for their buck playing games online,” said Alicia Butler, Editor.

The new six-point review and rating criteria are based on player experience, existing player promotions, games, cashier, welcome bonus, and comparative analysis. Three points of criteria are subjective and based on data, and three points are based on an expert’s subjective assessment.

Advertisement