Canada
Can Mobile Sports Betting Help Rebuild The New York Economy? BonusSeeker Speaks To Senator Addabbo
The following is an interview with Senator Addabbo, by BonusSeeker.com.
When the state of New York was facing a budget hole eclipsing $6 billion at the close of 2019, it was hard to imagine a scenario in which things could be much worse.
Fast forward a few months and the financial situation has gone downhill exponentially as the Empire State remains one of the most affected states by COVID-19 in every conceivable way.
Monetarily, the state is in absolute disarray for the foreseeable future because of the massive toll the pandemic has taken. But do you know what would help ease that burden? Legalizing mobile sports betting.
New York Desperately Needs New Revenue Streams
The truth is that New York needs new ways of generating revenue now more than ever before, and the millions that could be made by regulating online sports betting and allowing residents to play via mobile devices would undoubtedly assist in closing a still-growing gap in the state budget.
Perhaps nobody knows this better than Senator Joseph Addabbo, who is chairman of the New York Racing, Gaming and Wagering Committee and author of the legislation to legalize mobile wagering in the Empire state (Bill S17D).
“In light of this coronavirus, which has crippled us financially, we need the revenue now and we need the revenue next year when there is no federal stimulus money coming in,” the Senator said to BonusSeeker‘s Brian Sausa, in reference to the multiple packages that congress has passed to help states amid the pandemic. “The market calls for the mobile device, that’s when you maximize your revenue and your activity.”
New York’s financial woes are nothing new, and Addabbo has been the most vocal proponent of online sports betting in New York long before COVID-19 hit.
But whatever tough times were ahead as 2019 came to an end, the situation quickly got worse than anyone could have expected, and much faster.
According to budget documents, New York’s $6 billion deficit was on track to pass $8 billion by 2023, which would signal the deepest financial crisis since 2010 when the state was dealing with a $10 budget gap during the recession.
But as a result of the pandemic further ravaging the state economy, a report released in April from Governor Andrew Cuomo’s budget office finds that the gap could reach a staggering $13 billion in 2020 alone, shattering the mark from a decade ago.
These figures aren’t any fun to face, but they are important because they help paint a picture of the seriousness of the financial desperation that the state is facing.
As is the case with most aspects of our society, the sports landscape currently looks nothing like the one we’re accustomed to. At some point, however, leagues will come back and sports betting will go back to being the lucrative industry it has proven itself to be over the past two years.
Raising taxes and handing out more traffic tickets, two things New York is already looking into, may always be popular ways to fill a massive budget gap, but they can’t be the only courses of action.
New York Already Allows Sports Betting, But It’s Not Mobile
It needs to be noted that sports betting in New York is legal, just not in its ideal form. The state legalized wagering on athletic events in 2013, and following the repeal of PASPA in May 2018, operations launched some 14 months later.
The issue is that it was and still is limited to land-based casinos (which are mostly in the northern part of the state) with no provisions for online betting, which is the game-changer in terms of revenue creation.
Addabbo, whose 15th District covers parts of South Queens in New York City, is one of many legislators whose constituents aren’t in a position to take part in sports betting in the state as the law currently allows.
“I love Resorts World-Catskills, I think they did a phenomenal job at the site, but my people are not driving two hours north to go place a bet. They’re driving 20 minutes to Jersey. There lies the problem.”
The Senator is touching on a much larger issue at hand in the Empire State. Without any downstate casinos and so much of the population and betting demographic located in and around New York City, can the state really afford to continue losing out on revenue to New Jersey?
Making the betting experience exponentially easier for bettors by including the mobile component could wind up going an extremely long way because as the Senator notes, the public prefers simplicity.
“People look for convenience. They look for what’s safe for them, what’s legal, but they look for convenience…they go across the border to [New] Jersey because it’s simple.”
How Is New Jersey Mobile Sports Betting Working Out?
If any state out there is looking for a blueprint on how to roll out mobile sports betting, look no further than neighboring New Jersey for an example of the impact it can have.
In 2019, the first full year of regulated sports betting in New Jersey, the state took in nearly $4.6 billion in wagers, which resulted in around $300 million in total revenue. Once factoring in tax rates, that’s $36 million that went straight to the state and local governments.
Considering the fact that well over 80 percent of the wagers in the Garden State are placed on a mobile device, New Jersey is evidence of how vital the online component is to the overall earning capability of sports betting.
The potential in New York can be actually seen in the figures coming from its neighbor, and it only makes the case for online wagering in the Empire State even stronger.
A study from research firm Eilers & Krejcik Gaming reported that in 2019, New Yorkers placed an estimated $837 million total in sports bets in New Jersey.
That was about one-fifth of the total amount wagered in the Garden State throughout the year, a direct result of New York residents crossing the border to wager or calling friends and relatives in New Jersey to place wagers.
Factoring in taxes, that amount bears out to nearly $60 million in total revenue and about $6 million in taxes for the state. That number may not sound very high but consider the fact that part of the tax revenue generated from sports betting goes straight to job creation and funding educational programs in the state.
In total, over 38 million Americans applied for unemployment in a span of just over two months with over 1.5 million claims coming from New Yorkers as of the first week in May. Is any amount of money or number of jobs too small to help the residents of New York?
Besides, once you add in all the factors that come with enacting mobile wagering in New York, that number explodes. The study estimated that the Empire State is missing out on over $200 million per year by leaving online sports betting off the table.
For comparison, sports betting at land-based venues produced a grand total of $6.8 million in revenue from the time it launched in July through the second half of the year.
It’s also worth noting that the state has unused gaming licenses, which according to Addabbo’s bill, could be sold for $12 million apiece in initial fees.
“They [the licenses] are sitting on a shelf, doing nothing for us. Making no revenue, creating no jobs, no educational funding. They’re sitting there until the year 2023,” said Addabbo.
Will Cuomo Get On Board With NY Mobile Sports Betting?
The biggest hurdle that comes with attempting to pass this legislation is getting Governor Cuomo to change his mind.
Seemingly, part of what has given the governor pause is the issue of addiction and the possible negative impact that wide-ranging legal sports betting could have on the public. Even that, however, is something Addabbo’s bill has covered.
“I understand the governor may have apprehension about the pitfalls of gaming. Well, we took care of that,” the Senator points out. “Our gaming commission has been given accolades nationally for the programs that deal with addiction issues. The idea here is that we cannot move forward in terms of gaming in our state without addressing simultaneously the critical issue of the addiction part. So, I’m confident we will.”
The governor has already left mobile sports betting off the budget for the fiscal year 2021 and seemingly categorized these types of gaming as “creative although irresponsible revenue sources” in his address back in January.
Since the most important issues have been addressed and New York has now felt the wrath of COVID-19, the question needs asking: just how responsible would it be to continue leaving upwards of $200 million per year on the table when the state is in dire need of budget relief?
“What we have tried to do was convince the governor that certainly, the numbers are there,” Addabbo points out. “Whether it’s money lost to New Jersey, whether it’s money lost to an illegal activity that doesn’t appear on tax returns, it’s money that’s not there to gain for our state.”
It’s a simple fact that New York needs the revenue and it’s quite incomprehensible at this point to see sports betting as a perfectly viable option for revenue generation, especially considering what state residents are already allowed to wager on.
New York Has Legal Gaming, Just No Online Sports Betting
The benefits that the state can reap from sports betting are the same ones it always enjoys from other resources, and Senate Bill 17D is merely attempting to add to the ways in which New York generates tax revenue.
“It’s not like we’re re-creating the wheel, we have it here already,” Addabbo explained. “We have it in terms of Mega, Powerball, Lotto, we already have it. We already have casinos, we already have sports betting. We already have all the elements of gaming in our state.”
The governor has attempted to camp himself on the moral high ground but it exposes the contradictory nature of the logic being applied to this issue.
We are all free to wager our hard-earned dollars on the state lottery with hopes of walking away with more money than we had before, and we can even track the results online. On its most basic level, that process doesn’t really differ from placing a sports bet.
Anybody can drive upstate to one of the several New York casinos with legal sports betting and place a wager, but doing it from the comfort of your own living room is an irresponsible way for the state to make money?
The case for legal sports betting in New York is clear-cut and convincing, but obviously the job is not done. The last hope for Addabbo and other proponents of getting this done in 2020 is a study to be done by the state gaming commission, which should have its final report released sometime in June.
“That may be a telltale sign of where we go forward with this issue,” Addabbo says. “I am pushing to do it this year. Mobile sports betting, the three licenses, this year. Until December 31st, that’s my push.”
The governor’s approach to the difficult times the state has faced in recent months has been very matter-of-fact. If that same pragmatism gets applied to mobile sports betting, it will become obvious that it has all the tenants of becoming a vehicle in which the state can use to help drive itself out of the financial ditch it currently lies.
The question now becomes whether New York is finally ready to take advantage of the opportunity.
SOURCE BonusSeeker.com
Powered by WPeMatico
Canada
High 5 Games Expands Across Alberta’s Open iGaming Market Following AGLC Supplier Approval
High 5 Games, the creator of premium casino content for the land based, online and social gaming markets announced it has secured supplier approval from the Alberta Gaming, Liquor and Cannabis Commission (AGLC), extending its games beyond Play Alberta to all licensed operators in the province’s newly opened commercial iGaming market.
High 5 Games has entertained Alberta players since 2024 through Play Alberta, the province’s government operated gaming platform, where titles such as DaVinci DeluxeWays, Billionaire’s Bank, Green Machine and more have become established player favourites. With Alberta’s commercial market now open, that same proven portfolio is available to all licensed operators entering the province.
Alberta’s commercial iGaming market will be opening on July 13, 2026, making it the second Canadian province after Ontario to welcome private sector operators. Overseen by AGLC and the Alberta iGaming Corporation (AiGC), the market launched with nearly 50 registered operator brands, one of the most anticipated regulated market openings in North America this year.
The approval extends High 5 Games’ regulated North American footprint, which includes New Jersey, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, West Virginia, Ontario, Quebec, British Columbia. Alberta players will gain access to High 5’s catalogue of player favourite titles, including DaVinci DeluxeWays, Billionaire’s Bank, Green Machine and other titles through launch partnerships with operators.
“Alberta players already know and love our games through Play Alberta, that is a head start no newcomer to this market can claim. With the open market live, every operator in the province can now offer their players the award winning High 5 titles they have been playing for years, from day one.” says Tony Singer, CEO at High 5 Games.
High 5 Games’ content is certified across New Jersey, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, West Virginia, Ontario, British Columbia and the studio has developed more than 300 games over three decades of game making.
The post High 5 Games Expands Across Alberta’s Open iGaming Market Following AGLC Supplier Approval appeared first on Americas iGaming & Sports Betting News.
AGLC
High 5 Games wins AGLC supplier approval ahead of Alberta iGaming launch
The supplier can now distribute its online casino titles beyond Play Alberta to all licensed operators in the province.
High 5 Games has secured supplier approval from the Alberta Gaming, Liquor and Cannabis Commission (AGLC), allowing the studio to supply its online casino content to all licensed operators in Alberta’s newly opened commercial iGaming market.
The company has been live in the province since 2024 via Play Alberta, the government-operated platform, where it said titles including DaVinci DeluxeWays, Billionaire’s Bank and Green Machine have become player favourites. With the commercial market now open, High 5 Games said the same portfolio can be offered across operators entering Alberta.
Alberta’s commercial iGaming market is set to open on July 13, 2026, becoming Canada’s second province after Ontario to allow private-sector operators. The market is overseen by AGLC and the Alberta iGaming Corporation (AiGC) and launched with nearly 50 registered operator brands, according to the company.
“Alberta players already know and love our games through Play Alberta, that is a head start no newcomer to this market can claim. With the open market live, every operator in the province can now offer their players the award winning High 5 titles they have been playing for years, from day one.” says Tony Singer, CEO at High 5 Games.
High 5 Games said the AGLC approval expands its regulated North American footprint, which it listed as including New Jersey, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, West Virginia, Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia. The company said it has developed more than 300 games over three decades.
The post High 5 Games wins AGLC supplier approval ahead of Alberta iGaming launch appeared first on EE Gaming | Global iGaming & Tech Intelligence Hub.
BCLC
Canada’s Safer Gambling Gap: Why Market Success Doesn’t Always Equal Player Safety
Canada’s online gambling market is the third-largest in the world. It generated approximately CAD 13.15 billion in 2025, growing faster than virtually any other country. By the metrics the industry tends to reach for, it is a success story.
Unfortunately, where many of the metrics that matter for player protection are concerned, the story is different. Unlike several other countries, Canada has no national self-exclusion register and no national licensing framework.
While Ontario is regulated, and there is a lot of excitement around Alberta opening its regulated market this summer, the overwhelming majority of online gambling in the country still happens on unlicensed platforms.
An Ontario or Alberta player who self-excludes still can gamble through offshore sites or outside the province. Canada has no single stop button.
Key Findings
- Canada has no national self-exclusion register, no national licensing framework, and the last national survey predates the legalisation of single-event sports betting.
- Offshore leakage outside Ontario ranges from 49% to 93% by province. The offshore market grew at 40% year-on-year in 2025.
- Ontario has a 91.1% channelisation rate, but 20.2% of players also play on unregulated sites.
- Player awareness of RG tools in Ontario stands at 65.4%, according to iGO’s own Leger survey baseline. No province publishes data on actual tool uptake rates.
- A CMAJ study found gambling helpline contacts in Ontario rose 198% after market privatisation, concentrated almost entirely in men aged 15 to 44.
A Fragmented System
Canada’s gambling framework is a product of its constitution. Sections 91 and 92 of the Constitution Act distribute authority to the provinces, and Section 207 of the Criminal Code permits them to conduct and manage lottery schemes within their own borders. A 1985 federal-provincial agreement completed the transfer, leaving Ottawa without a gambling regulator and the country without national standards of any kind.
The result is ten parallel regimes, all operating at different standards. Ontario operates an open market, and Alberta is building a similar structure. Every other province runs a government monopoly: BCLC’s PlayNow, Loto-Quebec’s Espace-jeux, and the Atlantic Lottery Corporation.
The issue is that there is no connection between these. A responsible gambling tool in one province has no power in another. A self-exclusion registered in Ontario does not block a player from gambling elsewhere.
Changes do not appear to be on the horizon, with no federal legislation on those issues currently before Parliament.

The Offshore Risks
The Blask 2025 USA and Canada iGaming Landscape Report highlights the scale of this problem. Saskatchewan carries an estimated 93% offshore leakage rate. Alberta and Manitoba sit at 88%. Quebec, where Loto-Quebec has operated since 2010, holds only around 17% of a market estimated at CAD 2.3 billion.
Even British Columbia, with years of PlayNow operations behind it, retains approximately 49-51% of its online market, according to Blask’s reports. Offshore platforms grew at 40% year-on-year in 2025, nearly double the 23% growth of domestic licensed operators.
Ontario’s Success and Limits
Ontario deserves genuine credit for its current position, and it is often hailed as an example of a strong regulatory market.
The regulated market generated CAD 82.7 billion in wagers and CAD 2.9 billion in gross gaming revenue in FY2024/25. Channelisation, measured by the share of online gamblers using regulated platforms, reached 83.7% in early 2025 and 91.1% on the most recent IPSOS survey.
However, the Ontario story is often viewed as the national story, and this is not the case. Even within the province, 20.2% of players using regulated platforms also gamble on unregulated sites.
BetGuard, launched in May 2026, finally delivered the centralised self-exclusion system that the market should have had from day one, allowing a player to exclude from all regulated platforms at once.
The early take-up numbers show more than 500 people registered for BetGuard in its first two weeks. That is not a negligible start, and iGaming Ontario has stated it will measure the platform’s success by renewal rates, term lengths selected, and connections to addiction support services.
However, Ontario’s market has 1.235 million active player accounts. The gap between the scale of the regulated market and the early uptake of the tool is wide.
The deeper problem is that BetGuard is province-bound. A player who is excluded in Ontario is not blocked elsewhere.
Many other countries have solved this problem. GAMSTOP in the UK covers all licensed remote operators under a single registration. Spelpaus in Sweden does the same across online and land-based channels. BetStop in Australia covers approximately 150 licensed wagering providers with a five-minute sign-up.
Canada has no equivalent, and there is currently no route to making one.

What the Evidence Says
The academic case for nationally coordinated self-exclusion is strong. A comparative review of self-exclusion programmes across multiple jurisdictions found that the reach and enforcement of any scheme vary directly with how completely it covers the market.
A review of BCLC’s voluntary self-exclusion programme found that 97% of participants who gambled while excluded did so at venues not covered by their agreement. The exclusion worked where it applied, but not beyond that.
The tool-uptake literature is equally sobering. Studies analysing voluntary deposit-limit setting across large player populations find uptake rates in the low single digits over three-month periods. Ontario does not publish equivalent figures, but iGO’s own Leger survey in 2024 found that only 65.4% of regulated players were aware of available RG tools.
The gap between knowing a tool exists and using it is consistently wide, and no regulator publishes data on actual tool engagement rates. That absence is itself a significant accountability problem.
Where public health data does exist, it is alarming. British Columbia’s 2025/26 prevalence study found that 35% of past-year online gamblers showed moderate or high-risk behaviour.
The most striking recent evidence comes from a January 2026 CMAJ study analysing contacts with Ontario’s ConnexOntario helpline over thirteen years.
The study found that gambling-related contacts increased from a monthly rate of 13.4 per million before online gambling launched, to 17.0 after PlayOLG’s introduction, to 26.2 following the market opening in April 2022.
The increases occurred almost exclusively in adolescent boys and men aged 15 to 44, with the 15-to-24 age group estimated to have seen contacts rise by 337.8%.
A regulated market that generates record-breaking wagers and a near-200% increase in gambling-related helpline contacts simultaneously is simply demonstrating that market growth and player protection are not the same thing.

The Future
Alberta’s launch will introduce centralised self-exclusion from day one, requiring all registered operators to integrate with AGLC’s self-exclusion programme as a condition of registration.
This is a huge step in the right direction, but, like BetGuard, it will still be province-bound.
The case for a shared register is strong. Licensed operators are also competing with offshore threats. A functioning national self-exclusion infrastructure, combined with the channelisation benefits that a well-regulated market delivers, serves their commercial interests as directly as it serves players’ welfare.
If Canada is going to solve its responsible gambling issues, it needs to admit that the fragmented framework has shortcomings in customer care and stop using Ontario’s success as a stand-in for the country as a whole.
The post Canada’s Safer Gambling Gap: Why Market Success Doesn’t Always Equal Player Safety appeared first on Americas iGaming & Sports Betting News.
-
Bucharest6 days agoEeze opens 1,200 sqm Bucharest hub for technical teams
-
AB Trav och Galopp5 days agoBetMakers Technology Group Selected to Distribute ATG Horse Racing Content Across Australia and New Zealand
-
API integration6 days agoBelatra signs cooperation deal to distribute slots via VeliGames
-
BETANO6 days agoPlay’n GO strengthens Latin American presence with Betano Colombia launch
-
affiliate marketing7 days agoSEOBROTHERS’ Aleksandra Drigo flags higher barriers for affiliates in regulated Alberta
-
Aino Lahti6 days agoKasinohai Audit: Most Slots Could Be Affected by Finland’s Draft Gambling Rules
-
Aviator6 days agoPernambuco court revokes Spribe’s interim relief in Aviator trademark dispute
-
game content6 days agoR. Franco Digital releases fighting game-themed slot Spin Fighters



