Latest News
Creatives That Overcome Pain Points: Affiliate Case Studies By N1 Partners
What mistakes do partners most often make when launching and scaling ad campaigns?
What real challenges do they face in day-to-day work, and what prevents them from achieving stable results?
In this case study series by N1 Partners, we break down real affiliate campaigns, highlight common pain points in affiliate marketing, and show how partners find practical solutions that lead to measurable success.
This edition focuses on ad creatives. No abstract “best practices” – only concrete mechanics, insights, and ideas you can apply to your campaigns right away.
The cases were shared by Bogdan Solodushchenko, Affiliate Team Lead, and Dmitrii Filippov, Affiliate Team Lead (SEO).
CASE 1 (Facebook Traffic)
Context
- GEO: DE
- Traffic source: Facebook
- Brand / vertical: N1Bet
- Campaign goal: Increase conversion
Initial Challenge (Pain Point)
- What wasn’t working in the creatives?
The creatives showed a low conversion rate from registration to first deposit.
- Was the issue related to format, messaging, visuals, or the offer?
Primarily to the information shown in the creatives and the creative format itself.
What the Data Revealed
- Which metrics indicated the problem?
Low reg-to-dep conversion.
- Where did the funnel break?
At the creative level and during audience targeting.
What Was Tested
- Visuals
Aggressive, dynamic video creatives with slot gameplay.
- Messaging (emotional vs rational)
High aggression and heavy use of triggers.
- Focus: bonus / product / UX
Emphasis on the bonus and a female character in video creatives.
Decision Made
What was changed in the creatives?
- Updated the bonus and featured a top-performing slot with proven product quality
- Added a dedicated promo code directly into the creatives
- Refocused targeting on the most active audience segments, segmented by gender, average age, and peak activity time slots during the week
Why this approach was chosen?
Users were not getting what they came for after landing on the product.
The promoted slot wasn’t visible, the bonus was outdated, and the product’s visual style didn’t match the creative – all of which created a mismatch in expectations.
Results
-
- What improved?
Reg2dep increased from 8% to 22%.
- What improved?
- How quickly did the results appear?
Almost immediately – visible within 4–5 days after relaunching the test.
Key Takeaway
- What worked best?
A full creative overhaul aligned with the actual product, which helped meet real player expectations. - Is this scalable?
Absolutely. Once a winning creative format is identified, we scale through variations – tweaking individual elements while preserving the core message and logic.
CASE 2 (PPC Traffic)
Context
- GEO: CA
- Traffic source: PPC Direct (Ice Fishing keywords)
- Brand / vertical: RollXO
- Campaign goal: Increase conversion
Initial Challenge (Pain Point)
What wasn’t working?
Most traffic came from Ice Fishing slot keywords, but the slot wasn’t available on the homepage. Users came specifically for that game, couldn’t find it immediately, and quickly lost interest.
Was this about format, messaging, visuals, or the offer?
The issue was primarily the incorrect landing page choice.
What the Data Revealed
Which metrics signaled the issue?
Lower reg2dep compared to similar traffic sources.
Where did the funnel break?
At the landing page selection stage.
What Was Tested
Visuals
Ice Fishing slot keywords.
Messaging
Pure slot-focused keywords.
Decision Made
What was changed?
Traffic was redirected straight to the demo version of the slot, and the game was also added to the homepage.
Why this approach was chosen?
Users interested in a specific game want immediate access, not extra steps inside the product.
Results
What improved?
Reg2dep increased by 8%.
How fast did the impact show?
Almost instantly – positive dynamics were visible within a couple of days.
Key Takeaway
What worked best?
Switching to a highly relevant, thematic landing page. Players landed directly on the demo and got exactly what they were looking for.
Is this scalable?
Yes – the approach can be scaled within the campaign and tested across other slots and games.
Quick Q&A
If you were launching these campaigns today, what would you do differently?
Bogdan Solodushchenko:
I’d take a more structured approach from day one: clarify with the manager what’s currently performing best, which audiences respond strongest, which top slots to use, and which bonuses convert best. And if campaigns lead to a specific slot, I’d ensure it’s immediately accessible on the product.
Key conclusions from these cases?
Bogdan Solodushchenko:
There’s no universal approach. Targeting and creatives must be customized per offer, because not every product supports the same funnel logic.
Who are these cases most useful for?
Bogdan Solodushchenko:
For all partners. New teams can boost conversion, while experienced ones can improve player quality. Personalization impacts both.
CASE 3 (SEO Traffic)
Background
After a major Google core update, conversion from the landing page on the Lucky Hunter brand dropped sharply in the DE GEO. The goal was to quickly find a working setup to retain the partner and preserve traffic volume.
Context
- GEO: DE
- SEO type: Cross-brand
- Brand / vertical: Lucky Hunter casino
- Campaign goal: Increase CR (reg2dep)
Initial Challenge (Pain Point)
What wasn’t working?
Click-to-registration was strong, but registration-to-deposit dropped significantly.
Root cause
The same landing page had been used for a long time, leading to classic creative fatigue.
What the Data Revealed
Which metrics raised red flags?
Very low r2d with strong c2r.
Where did the funnel break?
At the reg-to-deposit stage.
What Was Tested
- Slot-focused landing pages
Decision Made
Traffic was redirected directly to specific slots – not random ones.
After testing multiple options, the best performers were:
- Jetsetter
- Sweet Sugar
- Kenneth Must Die
- Bikini Paradise
Results
Which metrics improved?
R2D increased from 23% to 51%.
Time to impact
Within one month.
Key Takeaway
What worked best?
Fast reaction from the manager: identifying the issue early, flagging it to the partner, and implementing concrete corrective actions.
Is this scalable?
Yes. Creative testing remains scalable, especially as SEO shifts toward content quality rather than aggressive link-building.
CASE 4 (SEO Traffic)
Background
A partner requested a promo code-first setup, where the promo code had priority over tracking links. Traffic was planned from forums, platforms like Reddit, and Google search – both short posts with guides and long-form articles.
Context
- GEO: Worldwide
- SEO type: Parasite SEO
- Brands / vertical: Goldex Casino, Spirit Casino
- Page goal: Traffic from non-standard queries
Initial Challenge (Pain Point)
What wasn’t working?
At the approval stage, promo codes couldn’t be promoted separately without links.
Root issue
Players were not being attributed in stats after entering the promo code.
What the Data Revealed
Which metrics showed the issue?
High CTR but no registrations or deposits.
Where did the funnel break?
At registration.
What Was Tested
- Promo code flows without tracking links
Decision Made
What was changed?
Dedicated landing pages were built for these funnels, with full brand descriptions and clear promo code activation mechanics.
Why this solution?
Together with Product Managers, we analyzed the funnel, ran tests, and selected brands suitable for promo-code-driven traffic.
Results
What improved?
Traffic launched successfully, the hypothesis was validated, and the number of FDs increased.
Time to impact
Within the first two weeks after launch.
Key Takeaway
What worked best?
The promo code performed exactly as the partner expected. Providing the right functionality directly contributed to traffic growth.
Is this scalable?
Yes – we now understand how to properly use promo codes without tracking links and how to correctly track such mechanics.
Quick Q&A
If you launched these SEO campaigns today, what would you change?
Dmitry Filippov:
First, I’d evaluate how the creative performs on the partner’s specific source, not just overall stats. Second, I’d run multiple tests to explore all possible scenarios.
Main takeaway?
Dmitry Filippov:
Regularly review landing page performance and switch to alternatives immediately when performance drops.
Who benefits most from these cases?
Dmitry Filippov:
Teams working with large volumes who may miss isolated traffic drops. The manager’s role is critical – spotting issues early and bringing ready-to-use solutions. From a source and GEO perspective, this applies to any SEO type and any market.
Final Note
These cases once again prove that sustainable growth in affiliate marketing isn’t built on universal formulas, but on attention to detail: traffic source, GEO, product, and real user intent.
Most failures are fixable – the key is spotting the issue in time and doing the work to correct it.
And this is exactly where the N1 Partners affiliate team is always ready to help.
Join N1 Partners affiliate program and become number one in the industry!
The post Creatives That Overcome Pain Points: Affiliate Case Studies By N1 Partners appeared first on Eastern European Gaming | Global iGaming & Tech Intelligence Hub.
Resort fees are up 194% and Nevada’s live poker table count is down 38% since 2011, based on UNLV and Gaming Commission data cited in the report.
The cost of a one-night visit to the Las Vegas Strip has more than doubled since 2014, according to a new “Las Vegas Inflation Index” published by Ignition Casino. The report estimates a typical one-night “basket” of expenses at $667.85 in 2026 versus $319.09 in 2014, a 109.3% increase.
Ignition Casino’s basket includes the Strip average for a blackjack minimum bet, weekend one-night hotel stay, resort fee, domestic beer, bottle of water, dinner (entrée and drink), a show ticket and valet parking. In the company’s breakdown, resort fees show the steepest jump, rising from $19.43 to $48.49 (+194.5%). Other increases cited include blackjack minimum bets from $50.00 to $112.17 (+124.3%), show tickets from $82.86 to $175.91 (+112.3%), water from $3.00 to $7.00 (+133.3%), and valet parking moving from free to $40.
For poker, the report argues higher trip costs are landing alongside a smaller live product. Citing UNLV’s Center for Gaming Research and Nevada Gaming Commission Quarterly Reports, it says Nevada’s live poker table count fell from 957 in 2011 to 595 by end-2025, a 38% decline. On the Strip, the report puts active poker rooms at eight today—Aria, Bellagio, Caesars Palace, Horseshoe, Mandalay Bay, MGM Grand, The Venetian and Wynn—down from approximately 17 in the late 2000s.
The company also points to higher rake caps compared with 2014. It states Aria’s rake is “10% of the pot up to a maximum cap of $7 per hand,” Bellagio’s cap is $6, and the remaining Strip rooms are at $5, versus a 2014 Strip average cap of $4. Using an assumed 30 raked hands per hour, the report estimates that a $2 higher cap at cap-reaching tables equates to “an extra $60 per hour” going to the house, or $300 over a five-hour session.
At blackjack, Ignition Casino ties higher table minimums to shorter expected playtime for fixed budgets. It estimates a $500 bankroll would last about 2 hours and 22 minutes at the 2014 average minimum bet, versus about 28 minutes at the 2026 average minimum, using an approach it attributes to “casino risk analysts and quantitative mathematicians” and assuming 70 hands per hour and a blackjack standard deviation of 1.15.
The post Ignition Casino: One-night Las Vegas Strip spend hits $668, up 109% since 2014 appeared first on EE Gaming | Global iGaming & Tech Intelligence Hub.
Deal starts with the 2026 PMCO Western Europe Wildcard and adds a JanickaGaming ambassador program.
G2 and PUBG MOBILE Esports have announced a partnership aimed at growing the PUBG MOBILE esports ecosystem in Western Europe, the companies said on June 15, 2026 in Berlin.
The partnership begins with the 2026 PUBG MOBILE Club Open (PMCO) Western Europe Wildcard, with registration open now. G2’s in-house media and production unit, 62, will support tournament operations and community activations, spanning creator campaigns, media buying, and event management.
The first major activation under the agreement will be the 2026 PUBG MOBILE Global Open (PMGO) Western Europe Finals, scheduled for 11–13 September, with registration opening today, according to the announcement.
The companies are also launching an ambassador program for the region, naming German PUBG MOBILE content creator JanickaGaming as the Western Europe ambassador. PUBG MOBILE said she will stream PUBG MOBILE weekly and cover esports topics and tournaments alongside her existing social content.
“PUBG MOBILE has built something really special over the years. It’s one of the biggest games in the world and one of the most impressive esports ecosystems,” said Alban Dechelotte, CEO of G2.
Shaowei Chen, Head of Western Europe Publishing at PUBG MOBILE, added: “Western Europe represents one of the most promising growth frontiers for PUBG MOBILE esports, and G2 stands as a great strategic partner to drive this expansion.”
The post G2 partners with PUBG MOBILE Esports to scale Western Europe competition appeared first on EE Gaming | Global iGaming & Tech Intelligence Hub.
Gambling in the USA
Las Vegas Inflation Index: Cost of visiting Sin City for one night has more than doubled in the last 12 years
-
- An average spend for one night on the Las Vegas Strip now reaches nearly $670, compared to $319 in 2014.
- Resort fees have seen a 194% rise in that period – the steepest increase of all.
- Nevada’s live poker table count has fallen by 38% since 2011 – from 957 tables to 595 – while the number of active Strip poker rooms has halved.
- Strip poker rooms are taking an average of $300 more per five-hour session compared to 2014.
- With a $500 blackjack budget, you will bust nearly two hours quicker on average in 2026 compared to 2014.
The average cost for a one-night stay in Las Vegas has risen by almost 109% in the last 12 years, as revealed by research from Ignition Casino.
Based on the average cost of a basket of a typical visitor’s stay – hotel, food, drinks, entertainment and parking – guests are spending nearly $350 more per night in 2026 than they were in 2014.
That basket includes the average minimum blackjack bet, a one-night hotel stay, resort fee, a domestic beer, bottle of water, dinner (entrée and drink), a show ticket and valet parking. All recorded prices are Strip averages in 2014 and 2026.
The steepest single increase is resort fees: the add-ons charged on top of base room rates averaged $19.43 on the Strip in 2014 and have risen to $48.49 today – a 194.5% jump. Almost every other line item has at least doubled, with blackjack minimum bets up 124%, water up 133%, show tickets up 112% and valet parking going from free to $40.
Feature (On Strip)
2014
2026
% Increase
Blackjack minimum bet $50.00
$112.17
+124.3%
Average resort fee/night $19.43
$48.49
+194.5%
Weekend one-night hotel stay $125.80
$207.28
+64.8%
Domestic beer $6.00
$10.00
+66.7%
Bottle of water $3.00
$7.00
+133.3%
Dinner (entrée + drink) $32.00
$67.00
+109.4%
Show ticket $82.86
$175.91
+112.3%
Valet parking $0.00
$40.00
N/A
TOTAL $319.09
$667.85
+109.3%
But rising prices are only half the story. For poker players specifically, the cost of a Las Vegas trip has increased at the same time as the product itself has quietly contracted – fewer rooms, fewer tables, and higher costs per hand once you sit down.
Fewer tables, higher rake: Las Vegas poker’s shrinkflation squeeze
Las Vegas remains the live poker capital of the world – but the infrastructure supporting that reputation has been quietly hollowed out, and the players who remain are paying significantly more for a shrinking product.
According to data compiled by UNLV’s Center for Gaming Research from Nevada Gaming Commission Quarterly Reports, the state’s live poker table count stood at 957 tables in 2011. By end-2025, that figure had fallen to 595 – a reduction of 38% over 14 years, with no return to pre-2016 levels in sight.
The decline is structural and predates COVID. From 957 tables in 2011, Nevada’s count fell steadily to 587 by 2018 as casinos converted poker floor space to higher-margin baccarat. The pandemic accelerated the attrition – tables collapsed to just 413 in 2020 – and the recovery has been incomplete. Today’s total of 595 remains roughly 38% below its 2011 level.
On the Strip specifically, the picture is even starker. From approximately 17 active poker rooms in the late 2000s, just eight remain today: Aria, Bellagio, Caesars Palace, Horseshoe, Mandalay Bay, MGM Grand, The Venetian and Wynn. For Texas Hold’em and Omaha players, this consolidation means less table availability and less competition between rooms – and with fewer operators competing for players, there has been little pressure to keep rake in check.
Metric
2011
2025/26
Change
Nevada poker tables (statewide) 957
595
–38%
Active Strip poker rooms ~17
8
–53%
Average rake cap per hand $4
$5–$7
↑ significantly
Are Las Vegas poker rooms still good value amid rising costs?
The rake compounds the shrinkflation picture. Of the eight active Strip rooms, Aria charges a rake of 10% of the pot up to a maximum cap of $7 per hand, Bellagio’s cap is $6, and the remaining rooms sit at $5. In 2014, the Strip average was 10% up to a $4 cap.
Considering a fast dealer pushes out 30 raked hands per hour, an extra $2 in rake per hand – at rooms where the cap is reached – means an extra $60 per hour going to the house. Over a five-hour session, that is $300 less in players’ stacks compared to 2014.
Factor in the broader 109.3% price hike across the average Las Vegas stay and there is a serious debate to be had over value for money. Players are paying more to stay, more to eat, more to park – and then paying more rake across fewer available tables once they sit down.
The same squeeze is visible at the blackjack tables, where minimum bet increases have made a given budget go significantly less far than it did 12 years ago – offering a precise illustration of what the broader cost increases mean in practice.
You will bust two hours earlier in Las Vegas today compared to 2014 with a $500 blackjack budget
The blackjack minimum bet increase tells a sharp story about what rising costs mean in practice. Based on the average Strip minimum in 2014, a $500 budget would last approximately two hours and 22 minutes before a player would be expected to bust against the house. Taking into account the 124% increase in average minimum bet since then, that same $500 would now be expected to last just 28 minutes.
This is calculated using a methodology applied by casino risk analysts and quantitative mathematicians, factoring in betting units, the standard deviation of blackjack (1.15, accounting for doubling down, splitting and natural blackjack payouts), and an average table speed of 70 hands per hour. Full methodology is set out in the appendix below.
Las Vegas blackjack average time to bust (hr:min)
Budget
2014 (hr:min)
2026 (hr:min)
$100
0:06
N/A
$200
0:23
0:04
$300
0:51
0:10
$500
2:22
0:28
$1,000
9:29
1:53
Shrinkflation is usually associated with a chocolate bar that got smaller without the price changing. In Las Vegas, the same principle has played out across an entire recreational economy — only here, the price went up too. Fewer poker rooms, higher rake, steeper minimum bets and a resort bill that has more than doubled: the product has contracted while the cost of accessing it has soared.
Appendix: Blackjack time-to-bust methodology
The following explains how estimated survival times for a given blackjack budget are calculated, using the $500 at a $50 table example (median survival: 2 hours 22 minutes in 2014).
Step 1: Normalisation. Currency is standardised into Betting Units. $500 / $50 minimum bet = 10 units.
Step 2: Volatility Index. Standard deviation is defined. A simple coin-flip game has a standard deviation of 1.0; blackjack, with doubling down, splitting and 3:2 naturals, carries an accepted standard deviation of 1.15.
Step 3: Absorbing Barrier Formula. Median hands to bust is calculated as: n ≈ 1.66 × (betting units)².
Step 4: Executing the calculation. For 10 units: 10² = 100 × 1.66 = 166 hands to bust.
Step 5: Translating to casino time. 166 hands / 70 hands per hour = 2.37 hours = 2 hours and 22 minutes. The same formula applied to a $112.17 minimum bet ($500 / $112.17 = ~4.46 units; 4.46² × 1.66 = ~33 hands; 33 / 70 = 0.47 hours = approximately 28 minutes.
The post Las Vegas Inflation Index: Cost of visiting Sin City for one night has more than doubled in the last 12 years appeared first on Americas iGaming & Sports Betting News.
-
Latest News6 days agoN1 Partners x RAZE Case: ROI+ in Canada within 3 Days
-
Africa7 days ago
WorldGaming Enters into Partnership with African iGaming Alliance
-
Canada7 days ago
St8 cements Ontario content offering through latest partnership with RubyPlay
-
Canada6 days ago
N1 Partners x RAZE Case: ROI+ in Canada within 3 Days
-
Balkans6 days ago
EGT Digital signs sponsorship deal with CSKA Sofia
-
Booming Games5 days ago
Booming Games launches Ronaldinho’s Streetball Bonanza slot
-
Genius Sports4 days ago
LIGA MX and Polymarket Announce Sponsorship Agreement for the US Territory with Official Data and Integrity Collaboration from Genius Sports
-
Canada6 days ago
N1 Partners x RAZE Case: ROI+ in Canada within 3 Days
