Latest News
How to Drive Traffic Without Caps and Earn Without Limits? Betmen Affiliates x Marsa Team
Reading Time: 4 minutes
If you – an affiliate marketer – can generate quality traffic, then you can easily secure offers with competitive CPA rates. However, these often come with limited daily caps – a well-known pain point in the market. Other pain points include advertisers who are afraid of running into high costs, are reluctant to share other GEOs with advertising networks, or simply don’t trust you.
The problem of limited caps becomes even more apparent when resources allow affiliates to drive traffic in large volumes, and due to constant caps, partners have to gather dozens of offers at once in order to earn.
In this article, Betmen Affiliates and Marsa Team explain how to go about building relationships in the iGaming market. We discuss how the two companies worked using a spend-based traffic payment model with no volume limitation, and why such conditions are a real growth opportunity for affiliate marketers.
How Teams Typically Take on Offers and the Problems They Face
When an Affiliate Sales Manager agrees on an offer’s terms, rates and an offer’s technical aspects, the next step for partners is the test run. This usually involves 25-50 FTDs (first-time deposits). After the traffic is delivered, the advertiser checks the profitability over 1-2 weeks, analyzing player behavior, the percentage of bonuses that were used, and other metrics.
If the traffic quality is deemed suitable, the affiliate is given a small daily cap. The CPA rate, however, remains unchanged or increases slightly, resulting in little profit to the affiliate marketer in this collaboration.
We can see two issues with this partnership model:
1. Limited scaling opportunities. Very often, the advertiser may not be ready to provide a significant increase in the cap — for example, increasing to 70 daily FTDs instead of 50. Volumes such as these are insufficient for a large team of affiliate marketers. This means new offers must constantly be found, leaving the affiliate team to have to adapt to a new product and new conditions each time. Circumstances such as these make it hard to predict profits.

2. Even a converting offer might not be profitable. Let’s say an affiliate team has a good deal whereby they provide high-quality traffic and bring in a positive – though not high – ROI of 30%. With a volume of 50 daily FTDs, income is indeed insignificant. With a CPA of $100, in a month, an affiliate team could earn:

This offer results in a profit of around $1,000 per day. Working with the advertiser under these conditions is pointless if the offer can’t be scaled. However, if volumes were increased tenfold with profits of $349,000, the situation would certainly be more appealing, right?
The Uncapped Model Used by Marsa Team and Betmen Affiliates
To transition to an uncapped model, partners had to achieve a certain level of traffic quality without increasing the cost of acquiring deposits to critical levels. Team leads from both sides communicated regularly to solve problems together: they worked on targeting by excluding smaller cities, adapted age groups, and adjusted creative approaches. The Marsa Team was open to suggestions, and the quality of traffic started to improve.

Quality traffic always leads to higher lead costs, so Betmen Affiliates suggested that the Marsa team switch to a spend-based payment model and drive traffic at any volume – a proposal which was much more interesting and profitable than working on a CPA basis.
The spend-based model works like this: First, the GEO is selected, and the deposit price is set. Partners then receive a fixed percentage of their advertising expenses when they meet their target. The quality of the traffic is evaluated as a percentage based on the 14-day Deposit OAS (On Average Spend). For example, if you agreed on terms of 25% on the amount spent with a 70% 14-day Deposit OAS, you would earn $2,500 for every $10,000 spent on advertising.
The main difference with the spend-based model is that the same lead may cost $100 under a CPA model and twice as much when working on a spend-model. This means that the team sets its own cost per lead. The only condition is higher traffic quality: the advertiser will expect that these types of players will show better results than those acquired through CPA.
How to Get an Uncapped Offer and Other Traffic Conditions
We have two main recommendations:
- Build a relationship of trust with the advertiser. Approach requests to improve traffic quality not as a signal to terminate the offer but as an opportunity for long-term cooperation. The advertiser can always help with recommendations and advice — optimize campaigns together, and the partner will notice that you’re interested in mutual success.
- Test multiple approaches and analyze all available metrics. If you want to drive traffic using the spend-based model with no caps, you’ll need to find an approach that gives you the most cost-effective FTD acquisition price and provides the advertiser with the required quality.

It may take months before you and your partner come to a mutual understanding, but the numbers speak for themselves as it is well worth it!
Where to Get an Uncapped Offer?
At Betmen Affiliates, we aim for long-term and mutually beneficial cooperation. All you need to do is bring in quality traffic, and in return, we’ll purchase all your traffic volume. Register on the Betmen Affiliates website to kickstart a productive, successful collaboration.
The post How to Drive Traffic Without Caps and Earn Without Limits? Betmen Affiliates x Marsa Team appeared first on European Gaming Industry News.
Latest News
Boomerang Partners’ case study: exploring the new rules of sports marketing
Sports marketing used to be relatively straightforward. Major sports events – from international tournaments to league finals – meant big audiences, and visibility was often enough to drive results.
By 2026, that model is no longer enough. Competition for sports traffic has intensified, acquisition costs have increased, and audiences have become more selective in how they engage. Being present around major sports events is no longer a differentiator – everyone is there.
What matters now is not just how brands capture attention, but how they choose to work with it.
This shift is especially visible in affiliate-driven environments. As brands rethink how they engage sports audiences – and face tighter regulation and greater competition – affiliate strategies have to adapt just as quickly.
Performance is measured in real time, with teams competing under the same conditions and reacting to the same events.
This is where new formats and mechanics start to matter. Earlier this year, Boomerang Partners, a sports-focused affiliate program, brought together affiliate teams as part of the TIME TO WIN affiliate tournament.
The insights in this article come from real partner activity – from day-to-day campaign work to what teams tested during the TIME TO WIN tournament.
It’s no longer campaign-driven
The way sports marketing works is no longer built around campaigns. It’s built around behavior. What used to be planned weeks in advance now shifts during the event itself. Timing changes. Messaging changes. Sometimes, even the format changes.
The shift is simple: marketing is no longer planned around events – it adapts to them continuously, with messaging, concepts, and storytelling evolving from one moment to the next. These shifts don’t just affect how brands work with players – they also reshape how affiliate partners operate. As a result, partners have to adapt their strategies, formats, and approaches to engagement.
Personalization plays a big role here. Not as a feature, but as a baseline. Generic offers don’t hold attention anymore. If it’s not relevant to what the user is watching or reacting to, it gets ignored.
This is also changing how sponsorships work. Visibility still matters, but it’s no longer enough on its own. Brands are moving into formats that go beyond the match – content, integrations, and ongoing digital touchpoints.
At the same time, the space has expanded. Sports, esports, streaming – they now compete for the same attention, alongside a much broader set of content and digital experiences.
That makes timing harder. Big tournaments still drive peaks, but the build-up and the drop-off matter just as much. Planning around these moments is becoming more data-driven. Earlier this year, Boomerang Partners introduced its Sports Marketing and Betting Calendar 2026, built to map those patterns and help affiliates align campaigns with key moments and make more informed decisions around their strategy. In practice, partners use it to plan ahead for major events, streamline research, and structure content around both high-demand and niche sports.
From watching to reacting
Audience behavior has changed faster than most strategies – and it becomes especially visible in live, competitive environments.
During the TIME TO WIN tournament, this shift was hard to miss. Affiliate teams worked with sports traffic in real time, around live events, where attention moved constantly, and decisions were made on the spot.
Watching sport is no longer passive. During major matches, users follow the game while checking odds, reacting to moments, and switching between platforms. The second screen is no longer secondary – it’s part of the experience.
In practice, this meant that teams competing in the tournament had to adapt quickly – reacting to live moments, adjusting content, and aligning campaigns with audience behavior in real time.
That changes how campaigns are built. Timing matters more. Missing the moment often means losing the user.
Content is changing as well – and fast. Short-form formats capture a growing share of attention, especially among younger audiences. The full match is no longer the only point of engagement.
Behavior is becoming more social. Communities form around events – not just around teams, but around the experience itself.
Olesea Naidion, Brand Manager at Nightrush, TIME TO WIN participant, noted:
“The biggest shift I’ve noticed is that audiences don’t just ‘watch’ sports anymore – they’re actively participating. During major matches, people react to every moment – every corner, every substitution, every momentum shift.
The second-screen behavior is fascinating. Fans have their phones out the entire time – checking odds, chatting, and reacting on social media while the match is happening.
The traditional ‘sit back and watch’ experience is no longer how a large part of the audience engages with sport.”
What actually matters now
Not all traffic is equal anymore. Volume still matters, but it no longer defines success. What matters is what happens after the click – how fast users convert, how long they stay, and whether they come back.
This shift was clearly visible during the TIME TO WIN tournament. When campaigns ran around real-time events, performance was measured differently. There was no long funnel – the decision happened immediately, or not at all.
In practice, traffic and performance closely followed the sports calendar. Early peaks aligned with major tournaments, while quieter periods – such as international breaks – led to visible slowdowns. Consistent spikes on weekends also highlighted how closely user activity tracked live-event density.
Conversion has become time-sensitive. Delays cost results.
Retention matters more now. Acquiring users is more expensive, and users have more options. If they don’t see value quickly, they move on.
As a result, performance is evaluated differently. Impressions and reach are no longer enough to justify spending. What matters is whether activity turns into deposits, bets, and repeat engagement.
Olesea Naidion, Brand Manager at Nightrush, TIME TO WIN participant, commented:
“Engagement rate, conversion velocity, and customer lifetime value have become the most critical metrics. Impressions don’t pay the bills — action does.
We need to understand if content drives real behavior in real time, especially during live events when the conversion window is minutes, not days.”
What defines success
Sustaining results has become harder. Strong performance can still happen in short bursts. But without consistency, it doesn’t hold. The gap between short-term gains and long-term growth is becoming more visible.
What separates teams now is not access to traffic or events. It’s how that traffic is handled – how quickly it converts, how long it stays, and whether it returns.
That shifts the focus from individual campaigns to the full user journey. Acquisition, conversion, and retention are no longer separate – they have to work as a single system.
This is also reflected in how partners performed in the TIME TO WIN tournament. Even beyond the initial launch phase, participation continued to build, showing that sustained performance – not just early momentum – defines success.
When that connection breaks, performance drops just as quickly as it grows.
Anete Dunina, Head of Sales at Revpanda Group, TIME TO WIN participant, noted:
“Success in sports marketing will be defined by control over the full user journey. It’s about acquiring, converting, and retaining the right users, not just traffic.
Short-term wins don’t build long-term business.”
The shift is already visible across the market. It goes beyond marketing – reflecting broader changes in how sport is consumed, how brands operate, and how affiliate ecosystems evolve. Those who can adapt to it consistently will shape what sports marketing looks like next.
About Boomerang
Boomerang Partners is a rapidly growing global marketing agency offering a wide range of services. Boomerang Partners is an Official Regional Partner of AC Milan. In 2024, it launched the inaugural Golden Boomerang Awards – a global tournament for affiliate teams. More than 400 affiliate teams participated in the second season of the tournament in 2025. Partners of the Agency launched six new products in 2024-2025, contributing to a nearly 1.5-fold increase in product users.
The Agency’s clients’ portfolio contains 10+ brands offering affiliate and entertainment services across 40+ markets in compliance with local regulations. These products provide incentive programs and 24/7 multilingual support.
Best Payment Solution
Yaspa wins Best Payment Solution at SBC Awards Europe 2026
Fintech’s open-banking-based Intelligent Payments pitch focuses on Pay by Bank deposits plus real-time affordability and AML checks.
Yaspa has been named Best Payment Solution at the SBC Awards Europe 2026, held at Xara Lodge in Malta. The company said it won for its Intelligent Payments product, which combines real-time Pay by Bank transactions with AI-driven customer insights and verification.
According to Yaspa, Intelligent Payments is built on open banking infrastructure and uses consented access to real-time player financial data. The company said this enables operators to assess affordability, AML risk and financial vulnerability in under 10 seconds, before funds enter play, while keeping the process “document-free” for most users.
Yaspa CEO James Neville said: “We’re delighted to be recognised as Best Payment Solution at the SBC Awards Europe. This award is particularly meaningful because it reflects the shift we’re seeing across the industry – where payments are no longer just transactional, but a critical point for compliance, insight and player protection.
“By embedding real-time intelligence directly into the deposit flow, we’re helping operators meet evolving regulatory expectations while also delivering a faster, smoother experience for players.”
The company positioned its approach as an alternative to traditional verification, using a single consented bank connection to produce a financial profile that includes income patterns, cash flow volatility and indicators such as overdraft usage. Yaspa also cited structured user testing showing conversion rates of 74% versus around 15% for document-based KYC flows.
Yaspa said its risk intelligence is supported by research with the Behavioural Insights Team, analysing 733 consented open banking datasets to identify markers of gambling harm such as multi-operator activity and clustered deposits, which it said are embedded into its decisioning engine. The company said it is live with UKGC-licensed operators and expanding across Europe.
The post Yaspa wins Best Payment Solution at SBC Awards Europe 2026 appeared first on Eastern European Gaming | Global iGaming & Tech Intelligence Hub.
AI
Tugi Tark whitepaper puts AI iGaming support at €0.15 per ticket
Tugi Tark has released a 2026 whitepaper, The economics of AI-powered iGaming customer support, arguing that AI changes the unit economics of player support and can reduce costs compared with human-led operations.
The report cites “verified pricing” of EUR 0.15 per AI-handled ticket. It compares that with fully loaded employer costs for human support in Romania and Bulgaria of EUR 1.73 to EUR 1.88 per ticket. At a “realistic” 70% AI containment rate, the whitepaper claims a blended cost of about EUR 0.67 per ticket, which it describes as roughly a 64% reduction versus a human-only baseline of EUR 1.88.
Tugi Tark says its analysis draws on Eurostat 2024 labour cost data, published research on AI chatbot benchmarks, independent iGaming player behaviour research, and operational data from its own deployments. The company estimates operators can achieve a 55% to 75% reduction in total support expenditure, and argues AI can absorb volume spikes—such as during major sporting events—without additional hiring or training lag.
Harpo Lilja, founder and CEO of TUgi Tark, said: “In 2026, the ‘wait-and-see’ approach to AI is costing operators millions in unnecessary overhead. We aren’t just talking about chatbots; we’re talking about a fundamental shift in the unit economics of player retention.”
The whitepaper also frames customer support as a retention lever, stating that payment issues account for 52% of ticket volume and that slower response times drive churn. It claims a 0.5 percentage point churn reduction could retain an additional 500 players per month for a mid-sized operator, translating to €200,000 in annual revenue based on an assumed €400 Player Lifetime Value. Tugi Tark also claims AI agents average ~7 seconds for first response versus ~60 seconds for human agents, and outlines use cases across Responsible Gambling escalation, KYC/AML workflows, and GDPR-aligned data sovereignty.
The post Tugi Tark whitepaper puts AI iGaming support at €0.15 per ticket appeared first on Eastern European Gaming | Global iGaming & Tech Intelligence Hub.
-
Asia7 days agoBetby se asocia con QTech Games y amplía alcance de sportsbook en Asia
-
Canada6 days agoFanDuel Announces New Partnership with Toronto Tempo
-
Africa6 days agoBetConstruct AI to present World Cup 2026 sportsbook offer at iGaming Afrika
-
Asia6 days agoEGT lines up Asian-themed jackpots and ETGs for G2E Asia 2026
-
Canada6 days agoCanadian Lottery Coalition Names Molly Cormier as Executive Director
-
BETANO7 days agoBetano signs sponsorship deal with Argentina national football team
-
Asia7 days agoBetby partners with Qtech Games and expanding its sportsbook solution in Asia
-
Aviator6 days agoBrazil betting sector roundup: government bans prediction markets, integrity reforms advance, ad debate grows



